Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Young and Innocent (1937)

Young and Innocent (1937)
Member Rating:  
As early as 1937's Young and Innocent, Alfred Hitchcock was beginning to repeat himself, but audiences didn't mind so long as they were thoroughly entertaining-which they were, without fail. Derrick De Marney finds himself in a 39 Steps situation when he is wrongly accused of murder. While a fugitive from the law, De Marney is helped by heroine Nova Pilbeam, who three years earlier had played the adolescent kidnap victim in Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much. The obligatory "fish out of water" scene, in which the principals are briefly slowed down by a banal everyday event, occurs during a child's birthday party. The actual villain, whose identity is never in doubt (Hitchcock made thrillers, not mysteries) is played by George Curzon, who suffers from a twitching eye. Curzon's revelation during an elaborate nightclub sequence is a Hitchcockian tour de force, the sort of virtuoso sequence taken for granted in these days of flexible cameras and computer enhancement, but which in 1937 took a great deal of time, patience and talent to pull off. Released in the US as The Girl Was Young, Young and Innocent was based on a novel by Josephine Tey. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Nova PilbeamDerrick de Marney, (more)
Director(s):
Alfred Hitchcock
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Synopsis of Young and Innocent

As early as 1937's Young and Innocent, Alfred Hitchcock was beginning to repeat himself, but audiences didn't mind so long as they were thoroughly entertaining-which they were, without fail. Derrick De Marney finds himself in a 39 Steps situation when he is wrongly accused of murder. While a fugitive from the law, De Marney is helped by heroine Nova Pilbeam, who three years earlier had played the adolescent kidnap victim in Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much. The obligatory "fish out of water" scene, in which the principals are briefly slowed down by a banal everyday event, occurs during a child's birthday party. The actual villain, whose identity is never in doubt (Hitchcock made thrillers, not mysteries) is played by George Curzon, who suffers from a twitching eye. Curzon's revelation during an elaborate nightclub sequence is a Hitchcockian tour de force, the sort of virtuoso sequence taken for granted in these days of flexible cameras and computer enhancement, but which in 1937 took a great deal of time, patience and talent to pull off. Released in the US as The Girl Was Young, Young and Innocent was based on a novel by Josephine Tey. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

Theatrical Feature Running Time:
83 mins

Complete Cast of Young and Innocent


Director(s):
Alfred Hitchcock
Writer(s):
Alma RevilleCharles BennettEdwin Greenwood
Producer(s):
Edward Black
Categories:
Mystery & SuspenseForeign
Looking for special editions of Young and Innocent?
See All Versions
Subtitles:
Check All Versions
Closed Captioning:
Check All Versions
 
 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
WT Y.

Hitchcock's films from the 1930's tend to have overtones of the upcoming war. This is a light romantic comedy set in the English countryside. Watching both the customs and way of life in 1937, as well as the film techniques of that period, makes for a pretty interesting and quite enjoyable movie. In the Special Features there is a mediocre commentary track and, for some reason, a version of the movie with music and sound effects but no dialogue. Also the print was restored and there are two very brief interviews with Hitchcock.

Yes   |   No

 
Margaret W.

The plot is pretty implausible, but--despite this---I enjoyed watching this "veddy" English film, which gave another glimpse into the time between the wars from across the pond. The 80 minute length is very watchable in one sitting.

Yes   |   No

 
Megan E.

Good suspense flick from the master with a sweet love story. Worth watching

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 3 Reviews