Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

The Color of Money (1986) Reviews

The Color of Money (1986)
Member Rating:  
Oscar-nominated in 1961 for his performance as pool hustler Fast Eddie Felson in The Hustler, Paul Newman won that award a quarter century later when he reprised the role in The Color of Money. At the end of The Hustler, Felson was banned for life from playing the game professionally. In the intervening years, he has become what the despicable George C. Scott was in the 1961 film: a front man for younger hustlers, claiming the lion's share of the winnings. His latest "client" is arrogant young Tom Cruise, who is goaded into accepting Felson's patronage by his avaricious girl friend Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio. Cruise learns not only the refinements of the game, but also the dirty trickery that will help him lure in the suckers. As Cruise becomes successful on these terms, Felson seethes with jealousy, hitting the bottle and carelessly allowing himself to fall victim to another hustler. He tells Cruise to get lost, and vows to make an honest comeback. It is inevitable from this point onward that the younger and the older player will square off in a game for the biggest stakes of all: Fast Eddie Felson's self-respect. Both the original Hustler and The Color of Money were based on novels by Walter Tevis. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Paul NewmanTom Cruise, (more)
Director(s):
Martin Scorsese
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(12 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Jarrod S.

Paul Newman = Awesome. Tom Cruise = Nearly as Awesome. Together = A pretty great acting combo. However, the story just didn't pull me in. Why should I care about Cruise's character when his ultimate goal is swindling others? And that goes double for Newman. Not bad, but nothing particularly special. It does make me want to learn 9-ball, though. (P.S. I have never seen the Hustler, so that may have affecting my viewing experience)

Yes   |   No


Chris W.

Loved it....Appealing on many levels...Especially if youre a player...

Yes   |   No


Chris M.

I really liked this movie for a lot of reasons. If you like pool you will love this one. I like the fact that paul newman is in it. With the recent passing of Paul Newman this is gonna be a good buy.

Yes   |   No


Mark S.

Enjoyed the movie more for the trip back in time to mid-80s more than the plot of the movie. I kept waiting for the break out plot twisting moment, and was somewhat disappointed with the final 30 minutes of the movie.

Yes   |   No


Glen H.

More modern than the classic The Hustler. Still enjoyable. 3 Stars

Yes   |   No


Greg W.

You need to see "The Hustler" first because this sequel really builds on that movie, and a lot of deceptively small moments will mean a whole lot more if you've seen "The Hustler." Scorsese does a great job with this picture: the pool sequences are a tour-de-force, especially when the camera circles the table, but equally impressive is how he handles the actors. Cruise makes a huge leap from his previous pictures, Newman is excellent revisiting his best role (albeit at an older age), and Mastrantonio gives possibly the picture's best performance. It may not be Scorsese or Newman's best, nor better than "The Hustler," but it's still a solid picture.

Yes   |   No


Gavin K.

For me, this film is not just about pool, but in many ways life. I know, that sounds pretty terrible if you think about it too literally. I guess I just mention this because you don't have to like pool to love this movie. The concept of having a sequel so many years after the original that stays true to the characters is great. The style, editing and pace of the film pulled me in to the film, but ultimately it's the cast, specifically Newman, and dialogue that elevate this film into the "must-see" category.

Yes   |   No


Paul F.

Alright movie. Early Cruise work so its still fresh and not as homoerotic. It is primed perfectly to be redone or remade with for the 2010's. Think about it. Cruise could ever be the old pro teaching the young hot shot. You know you like it. Running time of 118 minutes is just too much for a movie that would have gone over a lot better had they shaved it down to 90-95 minutes.

Yes   |   No


Steve G.

Okay movie - but certainly not one of Tom Cruise's or Newman's finest !

Yes   |   No


Dashland B.

tom cruise is an arrogant p**ck

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Jarrod S.

Paul Newman = Awesome. Tom Cruise = Nearly as Awesome. Together = A pretty great acting combo. However, the story just didn't pull me in. Why should I care about Cruise's character when his ultimate goal is swindling others? And that goes double for Newman. Not bad, but nothing particularly special. It does make me want to learn 9-ball, though. (P.S. I have never seen the Hustler, so that may have affecting my viewing experience)

Yes   |   No

 
Chris W.

Loved it....Appealing on many levels...Especially if youre a player...

Yes   |   No

 
Chris M.

I really liked this movie for a lot of reasons. If you like pool you will love this one. I like the fact that paul newman is in it. With the recent passing of Paul Newman this is gonna be a good buy.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 12 Reviews