Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) Reviews

The Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
This greatest of all Frankenstein movies begins during a raging thunderstorm. Warm and cozy inside their palatial villa, Lord Byron (Gavin Gordon), Percy Shelley (Douglas Walton), and Shelley's wife Mary (Elsa Lanchester) engage in morbidly sparkling conversation. The wicked Byron mockingly chastises Mary for frightening the literary world with her recent novel Frankenstein, but Mary insists that her horror tale preached a valuable moral, that man was not meant to dabble in the works of God. Moreover, Mary adds that her story did not end with the death of Frankenstein's monster, whereupon she tells the enthralled Byron and Shelley what happened next. Surviving the windmill fire that brought the original 1931 Frankenstein to a close, the Monster (Boris Karloff) quickly revives and goes on another rampage of death and destruction. Meanwhile, his ailing creator Henry Frankenstein (Colin Clive) discovers that his former mentor, the demented Doctor Praetorius (Ernst Thesiger), plans to create another life-sized monster -- this time a woman! After a wild and wooly "creation" sequence, the bandages are unwrapped, and the Bride of the Monster (Elsa Lanchester again) emerges. Alas, the Monster's tender efforts to connect with his new Mate are rewarded only by her revulsion and hoarse screams. "She hate me," he growls, "Just like others!" Wonderfully acted and directed, The Bride of Frankenstein is further enhanced by the vivid Franz Waxman musical score; even the film's occasional lapses in logic and continuity (it was trimmed from 90 to 75 minutes after the first preview) are oddly endearing. Director James Whale was memorably embodied by Ian McKellen in the Oscar-winning 1998 biopic Gods and Monsters. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Boris KarloffColin Clive, (more)
Director(s):
James Whale
Format(s):
DVD  | Digital SD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(14 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Edwarda and edward H.

If you liked the original you'll love this one as well. Excellent for the year 1935.

Yes   |   No


Brian M.

When I was about six- to 10-years-old, my parents and three older sisters would not let me watch "scary" movies. At 53-years-old, I decided to relive my youth and watch "The Bride of Frankenstein." I'm guessing there is not a better monster movie ever made. Boris Karloff was superb as the monster, and the story and supporting cast were amazing. This movie is so good on so many levels. If you want to see the best-of-the-best in this (or any other) genre, I highly recommend this film. If you have a pulse (and you enjoy Frankenstein) you will absolutely love this film. Just so there is no misunderstanding, this is not a movie... it's a film. It accomplishes what few sequels in history have achieved. Namely, it surpasses the original movie which, by the way, is another classic film by James Whale.

Yes   |   No


Kimberly R.

I loved the scenery and the general spooky feel. The begining with the dreary, rainy countryside zooming in on the creepy castle was great. The interior of the castle superb, and then he spoke, and it made me laugh. The speech is highly stylized with rolling "r's" and everything. The performances would be huge in a theater of 3,500, let alone the screen, and the reactions were campy, and included free use of the "yikes!" reaction. I don't know if that was on purpose or not, but there your have it. I did, however, enjoy the movie once I accepted the style fo performance. I say, watch it!!

Yes   |   No


David E.

Not being a fan of Frankenstein-type movies, I'd avoided this one. Last month I finished the biog "Elsa Lanchester: Herself" and decided to watch the movie. Loved it. Learned a lot from the extra interviews. Worth seeing again. Scarlett G.

Yes   |   No


Isaac R.

Drink goood. Movie gooood!

Yes   |   No


Rene N.

My 8 year old daughter took an interest in the old time monsters. So I ordered this movie and she loved it. She did say that movies made back in the day were not as scary as todays movies. She thinks the Bride is mean for not loving Frankenstein.

Yes   |   No


A Scott B.

I was a great movie but it is old :) my favorite part is the unexpected people in the jars!

Yes   |   No


Richie C.

Classic actors, actresses. Classic movie all around.

Yes   |   No


Christopher S.

This was a great film. They just don't make movies like this anymore. The acting is stylized to fit the gothic/expressionist stylization of the film, which is full of dark humor and surreal moments. Don't expect to see the realism or cheap shocks of today's horror films.

Yes   |   No


Chad B.

I'm not sure why some say this was better than Frankenstein. I can see in some ways it is...it seems like they spent more time on the storyline in this one. Yet, the other scientist who made life by growing his creation....has to be lame even for a 1930's audience. Although Im sure the special effect was the talk of hollywood at the time.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $10.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 131 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Edwarda and edward H.

If you liked the original you'll love this one as well. Excellent for the year 1935.

Yes   |   No

 
Brian M.

When I was about six- to 10-years-old, my parents and three older sisters would not let me watch "scary" movies. At 53-years-old, I decided to relive my youth and watch "The Bride of Frankenstein." I'm guessing there is not a better monster movie ever made. Boris Karloff was superb as the monster, and the story and supporting cast were amazing. This movie is so good on so many levels. If you want to see the best-of-the-best in this (or any other) genre, I highly recommend this film. If you have a pulse (and you enjoy Frankenstein) you will absolutely love this film. Just so there is no misunderstanding, this is not a movie... it's a film. It accomplishes what few sequels in history have achieved. Namely, it surpasses the original movie which, by the way, is another classic film by James Whale.

Yes   |   No

 
Kimberly R.

I loved the scenery and the general spooky feel. The begining with the dreary, rainy countryside zooming in on the creepy castle was great. The interior of the castle superb, and then he spoke, and it made me laugh. The speech is highly stylized with rolling "r's" and everything. The performances would be huge in a theater of 3,500, let alone the screen, and the reactions were campy, and included free use of the "yikes!" reaction. I don't know if that was on purpose or not, but there your have it. I did, however, enjoy the movie once I accepted the style fo performance. I say, watch it!!

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 14 Reviews