Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Wetherby (1985) Reviews

Wetherby (1985)
Member Rating:  
In a novel and intriguing approach to storytelling, director David Hare has created an engaging mystery and human drama that ostensibly focuses on an innocent dinner party but is really about something else. Jean Travers (Vanessa Redgrave) is an old-maid schoolmarm who has lived in Wetherby, a small town in northeastern Yorkshire, all of her life. She is still haunted by memories of a passionate love affair with a young man who was later murdered while on military duty in Malaysia nearly 35 years ago in the '50s. One evening, Jean invites a group of friends over for dinner; the group is comprised of two couples, one of which spends the time sniping at each other. A young man, John Morgan (Tim McInnerny) is also in the dinner party. Jean thinks he was brought along by one of the couples; the couples, in turn, believe he was invited by Jean -- in short, he is a total stranger that everyone assumes is a friend of someone there. As the evening progresses, political topics of the moment are brought up and chewed over; Margaret Thatcher, Richard Nixon, and other notables of the era are discussed, and various comments are made on the laziness of today's youth. The dinner party ends, and the next day John Morgan comes back to visit Jean. While she is in the midst of preparing tea for them both, he takes out a gun and kills himself. The shock waves from his senseless act later reverberate among the dinner-party guests, as the police investigator tries to piece together the man's background and the dinner party itself. Questions are raised about his motives, and viewers see the dinner party again, moment by moment, in an entirely new light. ~ Eleanor Mannikka, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Vanessa RedgraveIan Holm, (more)
Director(s):
David Hare
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(14 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Kathleen D.

What a terrific cast in this movie. But I couldn't watch it for more than 15 minutes. It is incredibly slow and disjointed for those 15. Although all the other scenes are understated, the suicide scene is perfectly graphic and completely unexpected. I'm sending it back and wondering why I ordered it.

Yes   |   No


Linda S.

This movie was a big disappointment, considering the wonderful cast. It was choppy and hard to follow. It bounced back and forth in time and I didn't always know where in time certain scenes were taking place. So much was left unsaid, that I couldn't follow the plot and didn't figure out who a certain character was until a day after I watched the film. There were so many unresolved questions that the ending left you hanging. I don't recommend it.

Yes   |   No


Robert D.

Considering the quality of the cast, this film left me quite confused and unsatisfied as to the various motives of the principles involved. It jumped back and forth in time which was confusing and left the viewer wondering, what was that all about! The motives of the various characters was somewhat questionable and left one at a loss as to the meaning and import..all in all rather disapointing..I was banking on the quality of the cast to make it worthwhile but alas it wasn' to be. Anyway it was amusing to see a young Tom Wilkenson> 2 stars!

Yes   |   No


Peter G.

Given the noted cast and the wonderful acting, this film was a major disappointment. It was disjointed and confusing. It was difficult to follow the time frames of the various scenes. The plot was totally confusing. It took work to follow this movie. The ending made no sense and left me wondering what happened. All in all, a poorly edited and scripted film. Worth watching only for the acting --- everything else was senseless.

Yes   |   No


Megan E.

The bright, redeeming factor of this movie that prevented me from turning it off halfway through was Vanessa Redgrave's performance - it's stunning! However, other than that, the movie offers little else. It's disjointed, it's slow, and it lasts about 15 minutes longer than necessary for the plot. Not worth watching unless you love Vanessa Redgrave

Yes   |   No


Ann C.

This movie is challenging: it is like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, with all the pieces scattered on the floor. But I was determined to do it, since the cast of Vanessa Redgrave, Judi Dench, Joely Richardson, Ian Holm, and Tom Wilkinson is stellar. The film goes back in forth in time and centers initially around a dinner party and a horrifying suicide. One major key to understanding it is that Joely Richardson, Vanessa Redgrave's real-life daughter, plays the young Jean Travers (whom Redgrave plays as a mature schoolteacher). I did rewatch the first few scenes to clear up some confusion. But this movie is well worth the effort!

Yes   |   No


Kathy C.

I was annoyed by the end of the film - I ordered it for Judi Dench and Vanessa Redgrave, what a pleasant surprise to find Ian Holm and Tom Wilkinson in it and a young Joely Richardson. Plot disjointed and I just couldn't tie it together.

Yes   |   No


Joan M.

Not my cup of tea. Depressing. Rather an odd group of people - but I guess there are folks like this in academia.

Yes   |   No


Emma N.

Skip it.

Yes   |   No


SHARON P.

I like it, but with Venessa Redgrave I thought it was a good movie, it didn't make much sense until the end.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Kathleen D.

What a terrific cast in this movie. But I couldn't watch it for more than 15 minutes. It is incredibly slow and disjointed for those 15. Although all the other scenes are understated, the suicide scene is perfectly graphic and completely unexpected. I'm sending it back and wondering why I ordered it.

Yes   |   No

 
Linda S.

This movie was a big disappointment, considering the wonderful cast. It was choppy and hard to follow. It bounced back and forth in time and I didn't always know where in time certain scenes were taking place. So much was left unsaid, that I couldn't follow the plot and didn't figure out who a certain character was until a day after I watched the film. There were so many unresolved questions that the ending left you hanging. I don't recommend it.

Yes   |   No

 
Robert D.

Considering the quality of the cast, this film left me quite confused and unsatisfied as to the various motives of the principles involved. It jumped back and forth in time which was confusing and left the viewer wondering, what was that all about! The motives of the various characters was somewhat questionable and left one at a loss as to the meaning and import..all in all rather disapointing..I was banking on the quality of the cast to make it worthwhile but alas it wasn' to be. Anyway it was amusing to see a young Tom Wilkenson> 2 stars!

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 14 Reviews