Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Touch of Evil (1958) Reviews

Touch of Evil (1958)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
This baroque nightmare of a south-of-the-border mystery is considered to be one of the great movies of Orson Welles, who both directed and starred in it. On honeymoon with his new bride, Susan (Janet Leigh), Mexican-born policeman Mike Vargas (Charlton Heston) agrees to investigate a bomb explosion. In so doing, he incurs the wrath of local police chief Hank Quinlan (Welles), a corrupt, bullying behemoth with a perfect arrest record. Vargas suspects that Quinlan has planted evidence to win his past convictions, and he isn't about to let the suspect in the current case be railroaded. Quinlan, whose obsession with his own brand of justice is motivated by the long-ago murder of his wife, is equally determined to get Vargas out of his hair, and he makes a deal with local crime boss Uncle Joe Grandi (Akim Tamiroff) to frame Susan on a drug rap, leading to one of the movie's many truly harrowing sequences. Touch of Evil dissects the nature of good and evil in a hallucinatory, nightmarish ambience, helped by the shadow-laden cinematography of Russell Metty and by the cast, which, along with Tamiroff and Welles includes Charlton Heston as a Mexican; Marlene Dietrich, in a brunette wig, as a brittle madam who delivers the movie's unforgettable closing words; Mercedes McCambridge as a junkie; and Dennis Weaver as a tremulous motel clerk. Touch of Evil has been released with four different running times -- 95 minutes for the 1958 original, which was taken away from Welles and brutally cut by the studio; 108 minutes and 114 minutes in later versions; and 111 minutes in the 1998 restoration. Based on a 58-page memo written by Welles after he was barred from the editing room during the film's original post-production, this restoration, among numerous other changes, removed the opening titles and Henry Mancini's music from the opening crane shot, which in either version ranks as one of the most remarkably extended long takes in movie history. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Charlton HestonJanet Leigh, (more)
Director(s):
Orson Welles
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
NR
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(24 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Stephen S.

Another Orson Welles film that frequently makes it into the top 100 films - but it really is a stinker. Pulpy melodrama is being kind about it, with some really grim stereotyping of Mexican Americans. But the cinematography really is eye popping and enough reason for film buffs to watch it.

Yes   |   No


Kevin B.

Very boring, can barely hear Henry Mancini's score (which is why I watched it). Seeing Orson Welles this fat and overweight also made me sick. I had just watched The Third Man where he was younger. And a much better film.

Yes   |   No


Jim T.

I guess it's not bad for its time, but I've found the discussion about the issues and drama in making/reshooting the film even more intresting.

Yes   |   No


Marsha H.

Orson Welles, the actor, at his best while also shining as an innovative and first-rate director. Loved the duo bonus commentaries presented by the 2 lead actors and the restoration director.

Yes   |   No


Dorothy N.

Heston had a stupid role, and yet plays it rather badly. Everone else superb. Be sure to watch the specials for insight on Welles and Hollywood's attitude toward him. Jealousy? It looks that way. This movie is a welcome difference to today's flicks.

Yes   |   No


Mark P.

Kind slow..not a crime movie fan though.

Yes   |   No


Thomas W.

Sure the plot is sleazy and the casting of Heston is ridiculous, but this is a terrific film. You don't have to be a film school grad to recognize the brilliance of the opening shot, where a car with dynamite in its trunk drifts in and out of the long tracking shot. Camera angles are always interesting, often cramped, often upwards. As an actor, Welles is a blast. All that, a world-weary Marlene Dietrich, Henry Mancini, and the evils of reefer to boot.

Yes   |   No


Clint E.

Touch of Evil is a solid crime thriller. It's one of those old Black and White films that just looks so good you can't help but be captivated. The performances are strong from this all star cast and a pleasure to watch. As far as story, it's good, but nothing that hasn't been told before. It's the look of the film and the actors that make this a cut above the rest and a joy to watch.

Yes   |   No


Jeannette H.

Orson Welles made many brilliant films in his career. This is not one of them. The first half is slow and tedious, and the second half is fast and tedious. Charlton Heston is *the* worst-cast "Mexican" ever, outside a western movie. One bright spot for me was Janet Leigh's feisty un-50's-like character, but she fell into the typical Female Victim eventually. The studio was right: this film did need improving.

Yes   |   No


Jonathan A.

This Welles' retelling of The Third Man. He has reset the story in Tijuana (or someplace very much like it) and has lots of menacing and ultimately ridiculous characters. Charlton Heston and Janet Leigh's characters could not be more absurd. (Janet has a gun but forgets it in a crucial scene among other absurdities.) Dennis Weaver does do a nice turn as the strangest inn keeper ever.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $20.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Stephen S.

Another Orson Welles film that frequently makes it into the top 100 films - but it really is a stinker. Pulpy melodrama is being kind about it, with some really grim stereotyping of Mexican Americans. But the cinematography really is eye popping and enough reason for film buffs to watch it.

Yes   |   No

 
Kevin B.

Very boring, can barely hear Henry Mancini's score (which is why I watched it). Seeing Orson Welles this fat and overweight also made me sick. I had just watched The Third Man where he was younger. And a much better film.

Yes   |   No

 
Jim T.

I guess it's not bad for its time, but I've found the discussion about the issues and drama in making/reshooting the film even more intresting.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 24 Reviews