Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Peeping Tom (1960) Reviews

Peeping Tom (1960)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Michael Powell's controversial meditation on violence and voyeurism effectively destroyed his career when it was first released, but later generations have come to regard it as a masterpiece. Karl Heinz Boehm stars as Mark, the son of a psychologist who kept a video journal of the boy's upbringing for research purposes. The constant intrusions profoundly affected the boy, who grew up to be a photographer himself; but his principal subject matter consists of women whom he murders before the camera. He then runs the films of his victims in their final throes so that he can study their reactions to death--a perverse extension of his father's experiments, which tormented Mark to analyze his reactions to raw fear. The British press had long been hostile to the unorthodox films of Powell and his partner Emeric Pressburger; when Peeping Tom came around, they used the film to castigate him as "sick" and tawdry. The passage of time has proven Peeping Tom as profound and accomplished as any of Powell's earlier films, and it ranks with Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window (1954) and Vertigo (1958) as a landmark exploration of the links among voyeurism, violence, and male sexual desire. Powell himself plays the evil father in the flashback sequences, and his son Colomba plays Mark as a child. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Karl Heinz BöhmMoira Shearer, (more)
Director(s):
Michael Powell
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(18 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Tim L.

Compare this and many of the early psychological horror films to the pablum served up today, and you will be saddened at the degeneration of movies. This film is absolutely brilliant, ranking among the best of Hitchcock, and far and away better than anything released in the last 20 or so years. A must see.

Yes   |   No


Ebony C.

The plot was enjoyable in a kind of Hitchcock sort of way. Also it was a classical horror movie in that there was no blood and gore and left room for imagination.

Yes   |   No


Jamie P.

This movie is still great even today. The use of technicolor and the angles of the shots in this movie are very well done. I think this was banned before because its a snuff film. It shows the creepy side voyeurism. Although some may find this movie slow in some spots its worth a look at. If you are a fan of the original psycho you should check this out it does have some silimarities. Its also called the british psycho.

Yes   |   No


Clint E.

I was excited when I was finally able to see Peeping Tom. I heard very good things. Gotta be honest, I was pretty underwhelmed. This movie has been compared to some Alfred Hitchcock's best movies, but I won't go that far. I have never been bored by anything Hitchcock has done, I was bored more than once during this movie. This thing just plods along and doesn't get very far. I get the message that was being sent through the movie, but it only goes to show the films lack of vision. It's definitely outdated. I absolutely hated the convenient ending. Far better movies have come before and after this one, it just doesn't stand out for me. If you ask me, pass this movie up and rent an actual Hitchcock - like psycho and rear window.

Yes   |   No


Wayne L.

This film knocked me out. Excellent portrayal by Karl Bohm. Tackled some subjects that probably couldn't be handled at the time (1960). Loved the look and tone of the flick. See how your parents can screw you up ?

Yes   |   No


Tobi and Sean M.

ok but not even close to a good Hitchcock movie

Yes   |   No


Glenn T.

This is great movie making - way ahead of its time - kept my attention and feels timeless in many ways. It stands on its own - does not need to be compared - enjoy!

Yes   |   No


Scott F.

Very weird and different. I can't exactly suggest it, but I say it was definitely interesting.

Yes   |   No


James L.

This was an ok film. The colors were very crisp and bold. I can understand why this is considered a UK's psycho version. You have to use your imagination as to what the women see right before the end. Deep dark secrets of childhood are revealed. Ok to watch maybe only once! ~ Susan L.

Yes   |   No


Kevin R.

I thought it was self indulgent & lame

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Tim L.

Compare this and many of the early psychological horror films to the pablum served up today, and you will be saddened at the degeneration of movies. This film is absolutely brilliant, ranking among the best of Hitchcock, and far and away better than anything released in the last 20 or so years. A must see.

Yes   |   No

 
Ebony C.

The plot was enjoyable in a kind of Hitchcock sort of way. Also it was a classical horror movie in that there was no blood and gore and left room for imagination.

Yes   |   No

 
Jamie P.

This movie is still great even today. The use of technicolor and the angles of the shots in this movie are very well done. I think this was banned before because its a snuff film. It shows the creepy side voyeurism. Although some may find this movie slow in some spots its worth a look at. If you are a fan of the original psycho you should check this out it does have some silimarities. Its also called the british psycho.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 18 Reviews