Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

A Man for All Seasons (1966) Reviews

A Man for All Seasons (1966)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Adapted by Robert Bolt and Constance Willis from Bolt's hit stage play, A Man for All Seasons stars Paul Scofield, triumphantly repeating his stage role as Sir Thomas More. The crux of the film is the staunchly Catholic More's refusal to acknowledge King Henry VIII (Robert Shaw)'s break from the church to divorce his first wife and marry Anne Boleyn (an unbilled Vanessa Redgrave). Sir Thomas willingly goes to the chopping block rather than sacrifice his ideals. Director Fred Zinnemann retains the play's verbosity without sacrificing the film's strong sense of visuals. The impeccably chosen cast includes Wendy Hiller as Sir Thomas' likably contentious wife Alice, John Hurt as the deceitful Richard Rich (More's put-downs of this despicable character provide some of the film's biggest laughs), Orson Welles as a dour Cardinal Woolsey, Leo McKern as the ambitious Thomas Cromwell, and Susannah York as More's daughter Margaret. The "Common Man," an important bridging-the-scenes character in the original play, is removed from the film version, which does just fine without him. A Man for All Seasons won six Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor, as well as seven British Film Academy awards. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Paul ScofieldWendy Hiller, (more)
Director(s):
Fred Zinnemann
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
G
Format(s):
DVD  | Digital SD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(30 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Cary B.

A pleasant film, with interesting visuals and well-drawn characters. Gives interesting insight into the founding of the Anglican/Episcopal Church and some of the hypocricies of the time. Top rate cast!

Yes   |   No


Nancy U.

They don't make many movies like this anymore-a real plot, intrigue, DIALOGUE , politics, back-stabbing, moral men vs. weak men. Sir Thomas Moore was a great man, and the King was a child. What a great display of why so many were be-headed in England while Henry was king. Excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes   |   No


Mary W.

If you are not a history savy person, like myself, I found this movie to be a must before renting (rerenting) "Elizabeth". It was so exciting to understand this important period of England's history. I understood the historial accounts offered in "Elizabeth" because I watched this movie. I also found it SO helpful to use subtitles, as the early English slang and accents made it difficult to understand the conversations.

Yes   |   No


May B.

I had to see it again... especially the superb performance by Mr, Scofield. I will go over the selections here a Blockbusters to see what other film gems I can find with him .... Wendy Hiller, oh yes... and Susanna York... John Hurt was so very young so was Vanessa Redgrave!!

Yes   |   No


Marsha H.

Wonderful portrayal of a difficult time in the life of a man with the courage of his convictions.

Yes   |   No


Rich P.

They don't make movies like this any more! A Man for All Seasons is probably my favorite movie. I enjoy movies that delve into the characters and what they are made of. In addition to being an historical account of the battle between King Henry VIII and the Pope during the Middle Ages, it chronicles the life and involvement of Thomas More, a simple man with a strong conscience who worked in the King's circle and could not abide with the King declaring himself to be the Head of the Church in England. More's interior struggle is well represented and the stellar cast gives an admirable performance in their respective roles. Thumbs up and up for this grand movie; I strongly recommend it.

Yes   |   No


Jeanne B.

The copy I received was cracked and could not be run. I tried 3 different players and they either said "error" or "no disc".

Yes   |   No


Jodi J.

A great movie that will stay with you for a long time!

Yes   |   No


Hannah R.

Wonderful and inspiring movie! However, the G rating is inappropriate. There are a handful of words not suitable for children.

Yes   |   No


Tracy M.

I watched this movie on the heels of BECKETT, so my opinion is skewed, but next to Beckett's perfomance by Burton and O'Toole, these men were mediocre, at best. And I question how historically accurate this movie was, since all of my history books portray Henry VIII as quite overweight and not what most would call handsome. Was the fine-looking Henry put in to woo women viewers?

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  from $10.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 103 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Cary B.

A pleasant film, with interesting visuals and well-drawn characters. Gives interesting insight into the founding of the Anglican/Episcopal Church and some of the hypocricies of the time. Top rate cast!

Yes   |   No

 
Nancy U.

They don't make many movies like this anymore-a real plot, intrigue, DIALOGUE , politics, back-stabbing, moral men vs. weak men. Sir Thomas Moore was a great man, and the King was a child. What a great display of why so many were be-headed in England while Henry was king. Excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes   |   No

 
Mary W.

If you are not a history savy person, like myself, I found this movie to be a must before renting (rerenting) "Elizabeth". It was so exciting to understand this important period of England's history. I understood the historial accounts offered in "Elizabeth" because I watched this movie. I also found it SO helpful to use subtitles, as the early English slang and accents made it difficult to understand the conversations.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 30 Reviews