DCSIMG
 
 

Human Nature (2001) Reviews

Human Nature (2001)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Video director Michel Gondry and scriptwriter Charles Kaufman -- who shot to fame after penning Being John Malkovich -- collaborate on this bizarre fable about human behavior in and out of society. The film opens by quickly introducing the three leads -- Lila (Patricia Arquette) who is locked away in prison; Puff (Rhys Ifans) who is testifying before Congress; and Nathan Bronfman (Tim Robbins) who is sitting in a glowing white afterlife waiting room with a bullet hole in his head. Rewinding to the beginning of the story, the film shows Lila as a girl about to enter womanhood. Unfortunately, puberty goes horribly awry and she starts to grow thick hair all over her body. After performing as Queen Kong in a circus freak show, she chucks it all and goes to live in the forest, where she becomes the best-selling author of a misanthropic hard-line ecological tome. At age 30, her itch for male companionship becomes overwhelming and she ventures back into the city. She is helped by electrolysis guru Louise (Rosie Perez), who not only makes Lila presentable to society, but introduces her to Nathan, a 35-year-old virgin who, as a scientist, has devoted his life to teaching table etiquette to lab mice. While showing Nathan the joys of the wild outdoors, Lila and her new beau discover an extremely hirsute feral man whom they dub Puff. Placing him a cage in his lab, Nathan sets out to teach Puff the ways of polite society while dreaming of fame and fortune. The first task is to curb Puff's enormous sexual appetite -- any time he catches sight of a female, Puff either tries to hump her or masturbates vigorously. Nathan yokes him with an electric collar that shocks him any time he acts unseemly. Unfortunately, the humans on the other side of the cage can't quite control their libidos either: Nathan succumbs to the incessant double entendres of his saucy French assistant Gabrielle (Miranda Otto) while Lila finds an animalistic lust for Nathan's science experiment. This film was screened at the 2001 Cannes Film Festival. ~ Jonathan Crow, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Tim RobbinsPatricia Arquette, (more)
Director(s):
Michel Gondry
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(11 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Rachel K.

it is definitely different and i didn't decide that i really liked it until the end. kaufman and gondry are just great.

Yes   |   No


Brian M.

No one is going to say this was the funniest movie of the year, but it was a good chuckle. Some good old "potty" humor is good for the soul, isn't it? Anyway it's worth a chance, go ahead, rent this one.

Yes   |   No


Robert P.

Well, this is ninety-one minutes of IQ-lowering drivel at its worst. I should have expected Tim Robbins to be perfect as the self-important, mindless clown that he is in real life. Unless you have something much more entertaining to do with your time...like clipping your toenails...then you should definitely watch this movie!

Yes   |   No


Steven K.

I thought this movie was horrible. I could not even watch the whole thing. Very weird.

Yes   |   No


Tammy F.

Makes you think twice about human nature vs. socialism. It's worth a watch at least once.

Yes   |   No


Eric H.

Review 147: early Charlie Kaufman screenplay before he acquired the talent to write interesting concepts into a skewed reality.

Yes   |   No


Joel W.

Tim Robbins has to be one of the best actors working in films today. The film takes a bit of time setting things up and certainly rewards the viewer who pays attention. The tongue in cheek linkage between a crazy childhood and a dubious research project is especially well done.

Yes   |   No


Troy J.

It's hard to imagine why this movie was made. The story ends up being non-entertaining, there is no real social commentary, there is no particular artistry in the film making. I thought with the level of talent involved that there must be something to it. A low point in the career of every person involved.

Yes   |   No


Ronnie M.

Charlie Kaufmann is an overrated writer. I know he is a nice guy and everyone in Hollywood loves his quirky scripts. However, just because they are different does not mean they are good. This movie had its moments such as scene involving Rhys Ifans ape-man character reaction to a picture of a naked woman. However, it just drug on and never amount to anything clever.

Yes   |   No


Rob S.

this one is not for everyone. it includes a very hairy patricia.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Rachel K.

    it is definitely different and i didn't decide that i really liked it until the end. kaufman and gondry are just great.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Brian M.

    No one is going to say this was the funniest movie of the year, but it was a good chuckle. Some good old "potty" humor is good for the soul, isn't it? Anyway it's worth a chance, go ahead, rent this one.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Robert P.

    Well, this is ninety-one minutes of IQ-lowering drivel at its worst. I should have expected Tim Robbins to be perfect as the self-important, mindless clown that he is in real life. Unless you have something much more entertaining to do with your time...like clipping your toenails...then you should definitely watch this movie!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 11 Reviews