Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Intolerance (1916) Reviews

Intolerance (1916)
Member Rating:  
Sometime during the shooting of the landmark The Birth of a Nation, filmmaker D.W. Griffith probably wondered how he could top himself. In 1916, he showed how, with the awesome Intolerance. The film began humbly enough as a medium-budget feature entitled The Mother and the Law, wherein the lives of a poor but happily married couple are disrupted by the misguided interference of a "social reform" group. A series of unfortunate circumstances culminates in the husband's being sentenced to the gallows, a fate averted by a nick-of-time rescue engineered by his wife. In the wake of the protests attending the racist content of The Birth of a Nation, Griffith wanted to demonstrate the dangers of intolerance. The Mother and the Law filled the bill to some extent, but it just wasn't "big" enough to suit his purposes. Thus, using The Mother and the Law as merely the base of the film, Griffith added three more plotlines and expanded his cinematic thesis to epic proportions. The four separate stories of Intolerance are symbolically linked by Lillian Gish as the Woman Who Rocks the Cradle ("uniter of the here and hereafter"). The "Modern Story" is essentially The Mother and the Law; the "French Story" details the persecution of the Huguenots by Catherine de Medici (Josephine Crowell); the "Biblical Story" relates the last days of Jesus Christ (Howard Gaye); and the "Babylonian Story" concerns the defeat of King Belshazzar (Alfred Paget) by the hordes of Cyrus the Persian (George Siegmann).

Rather than being related chronologically, the four stories are told in parallel fashion, slowly at first, and then with increasing rapidity. The action in the film's final two reels leaps back and forth in time between Babylon, Calvary, 15th century France, and contemporary California. Described by one historian as "the only film fugue," Intolerance baffled many filmgoers of 1916 -- and, indeed, it is still an exhausting, overwhelming experience, even for audiences accustomed to the split-second cutting and multilayered montage sequences popularized by Sergei Eisenstein, Orson Welles, Jean-Luc Godard, Joel Schumacher, and MTV. On a pure entertainment level, the Babylonian sequences are the most effective, played out against one of the largest, most elaborate exterior sets ever built for a single film. The most memorable character in this sequence is "The Mountain Girl," played by star on the rise Constance Talmadge; when the Babylonian scenes were re-released as a separate feature in 1919, Talmadge's tragic death scene was altered to accommodate a happily-ever-after denouement. Other superb performances are delivered by Mae Marsh and Robert Harron in the Modern Story, and by Eugene Pallette and Margery Wilson in the French Story. Remarkably sophisticated in some scenes, appallingly naïve in others, Intolerance is a mixed bag dramatically, but one cannot deny that it is also a work of cinematic genius. The film did poorly upon its first release, not so much because its continuity was difficult to follow as because it preached a gospel of tolerance and pacifism to a nation preparing to enter World War I. Currently available prints of Intolerance run anywhere from 178 to 208 minutes; while it may be rough sledding at times, it remains essential viewing for any serious student of film technique. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Lillian GishMae Marsh, (more)
Director(s):
D.W. Griffith
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(3 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Alexandria M.

This movie is long. I'll say it...it's like Titanic long, but without all the glitz and glam of Titanic. Well it did have the glitz and glam, but not in the same manner. Griffth's work is the answer to the critics who critized his most well known worth Birth of a Nation. Intolerance follows four different story lines. A modern one concerning "do-gooders" and the poor, the fall of Babylon, The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, and the trial and crucifixtion of Jesus. All of these based somehow on the theme of intolerance for something, most notably that of religious differences. This movie is not for those who need a lot of plot to keep them interested. It's fairly straightforward. And since it's a silent silm many may be bored by it. But it's something to give a change. It's a classic that shouldn't be missed.

Yes   |   No


Arthur A.

Alice B.....You missed the point! This movie is a milestone in filmaking and truly a masterpiece. I am a silent buff and this is tops on any list. Long...yes but what a wonder. The cast alone is a gift and includes many of the greats in silent cinema. The editing and filming is breathtakling!

Yes   |   No


Alice B.

The movie guide says this film is an essential for all film students, and I think those are the only people who will be able to sit through this. I love silent films but I am not a student. I could not watch this film. It held my interest for an hour and a half and by then I realized it was only half over and gave up. There are some stunning visuals but I think adding three more stories to the original modern story was just overkill. For today's audiences this film will probably seem archaic and heavy-handed. It did to me.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $20.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Alexandria M.

This movie is long. I'll say it...it's like Titanic long, but without all the glitz and glam of Titanic. Well it did have the glitz and glam, but not in the same manner. Griffth's work is the answer to the critics who critized his most well known worth Birth of a Nation. Intolerance follows four different story lines. A modern one concerning "do-gooders" and the poor, the fall of Babylon, The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, and the trial and crucifixtion of Jesus. All of these based somehow on the theme of intolerance for something, most notably that of religious differences. This movie is not for those who need a lot of plot to keep them interested. It's fairly straightforward. And since it's a silent silm many may be bored by it. But it's something to give a change. It's a classic that shouldn't be missed.

Yes   |   No

 
Arthur A.

Alice B.....You missed the point! This movie is a milestone in filmaking and truly a masterpiece. I am a silent buff and this is tops on any list. Long...yes but what a wonder. The cast alone is a gift and includes many of the greats in silent cinema. The editing and filming is breathtakling!

Yes   |   No

 
Alice B.

The movie guide says this film is an essential for all film students, and I think those are the only people who will be able to sit through this. I love silent films but I am not a student. I could not watch this film. It held my interest for an hour and a half and by then I realized it was only half over and gave up. There are some stunning visuals but I think adding three more stories to the original modern story was just overkill. For today's audiences this film will probably seem archaic and heavy-handed. It did to me.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 3 Reviews