Activate your BLOCKBUSTER On Demand device

Paths of Glory (1957)

Paths of Glory (1957)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Adapting Humphrey Cobb's novel to the screen, director Stanley Kubrick and his collaborators Calder Willingham and Jim Thompson set out to make a devastating anti-war statement, and they succeeded above and beyond the call of duty. In the third year of World War I, the erudite but morally bankrupt French general Broulard (Adolphe Menjou) orders his troops to seize the heavily fortified "Ant Hill" from the Germans. General Mireau (George MacReady) knows that this action will be suicidal, but he will sacrfice his men to enhance his own reputation. Against his better judgment, Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas) leads the charge, and the results are appalling. When, after witnessing the slaughter of their comrades, a handful of the French troops refuse to leave the trenches, Mireau very nearly orders the artillery to fire on his own men. Still smarting from the defeat, Mireau cannot admit to himself that the attack was a bad idea from the outset: he convinces himself that loss of Ant Hill was due to the cowardice of his men. Mireau demands that three soldiers be selected by lot to be executed as an example to rest of the troops. Acting as defense attorney, Colonel Dax pleads eloquently for the lives of the unfortunate three, but their fate is a done deal. Even an eleventh-hour piece of evidence proving Mireau's incompetence is ignored by the smirking Broulard, who is only interested in putting on a show of bravado. A failure when first released (it was banned outright in France for several years), Paths of Glory has since taken its place in the pantheon of classic war movies, its message growing only more pertinent and potent with each passing year (it was especially popular during the Vietnam era). ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Kirk DouglasRalph Meeker, (more)
Director(s):
Stanley Kubrick
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Synopsis of Paths of Glory

Adapting Humphrey Cobb's novel to the screen, director Stanley Kubrick and his collaborators Calder Willingham and Jim Thompson set out to make a devastating anti-war statement, and they succeeded above and beyond the call of duty. In the third year of World War I, the erudite but morally bankrupt French general Broulard (Adolphe Menjou) orders his troops to seize the heavily fortified "Ant Hill" from the Germans. General Mireau (George MacReady) knows that this action will be suicidal, but he will sacrfice his men to enhance his own reputation. Against his better judgment, Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas) leads the charge, and the results are appalling. When, after witnessing the slaughter of their comrades, a handful of the French troops refuse to leave the trenches, Mireau very nearly orders the artillery to fire on his own men. Still smarting from the defeat, Mireau cannot admit to himself that the attack was a bad idea from the outset: he convinces himself that loss of Ant Hill was due to the cowardice of his men. Mireau demands that three soldiers be selected by lot to be executed as an example to rest of the troops. Acting as defense attorney, Colonel Dax pleads eloquently for the lives of the unfortunate three, but their fate is a done deal. Even an eleventh-hour piece of evidence proving Mireau's incompetence is ignored by the smirking Broulard, who is only interested in putting on a show of bravado. A failure when first released (it was banned outright in France for several years), Paths of Glory has since taken its place in the pantheon of classic war movies, its message growing only more pertinent and potent with each passing year (it was especially popular during the Vietnam era). ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

Theatrical Feature Running Time:
87 mins

Complete Cast of Paths of Glory


Director(s):
Stanley Kubrick
Writer(s):
Stanley KubrickCalder WillinghamJim Thompson
Producer(s):
James B. Harris
Categories:
War
Paths of Glory Awards:
  • 1991 - Library of Congress - U.S. National Film Registry
Looking for special editions of Paths of Glory?
See All Versions
Subtitles:
Check All Versions
Closed Captioning:
Check All Versions
 
 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription 
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  from $22.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 
1000 
 
Member Reviews
 
Edmund C.

If you want the "same old, same old" type of war movie - skip this one. If you're a fan of thought-provoking, difficult films - this is a can't miss. In other words, if you're a Kubrick fan it'll be right up your alley. Man's inhumanity, the senselessness of war, the terror of warfare, all brought to the screen by one of film's best directors. Also, amazing to see the brilliance of Kubrick - so far ahead of his time. The long tracking shots through the trenches, the ultimately impossible attack on "The Anthill," the execution march - all look quite contemporary for a film that is nearly 50 years old. Nothing new for Kubrick, though - look how great the outer space shots in "2001" still look today. And then there's the song at the end.

Yes   |   No

 
John C.

Sitting down to watch Paths of Glory, I had no idea what this film was about. I assumed it would be your average "go get 'em" war movie with victory saved for the heroes. Instead, what I saw was a dramatic film with intriguing characters who each in their own way stir some sort of reaction, whether it be admiration, disdain, or a sort of pity or regret in their flawed humanity. No matter how you slice it, this movie is worth watching.

Yes   |   No

 
Amery V.

I really can see why this movie was so controversial in 1957. Powerful indictment of 19th century concepts of warfare in a 20th century war, costing thousands of lives for nominal gains. Arrogance, ignorance, and stupidity shine through - no wonder the French Army mutinied in 1917. The fimmaking is amazing, as many have described the attack scenes on "the anthill' etc. Kirk Douglas in probably one of his least known roles but I would say one that displayed his excellence as an actor - his non-verbal expressions were far more powerful than his spoken lines.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All 27 Reviews