DCSIMG
 
 

L'Age d'Or (1930)

L'Age d'Or (1930)
Member Rating:  
L'Âge d'Or begins as a documentary about the habits of scorpions, utilizing library footage and silent-style intertitles. Amid the rocks of an inlet, archbishops are seen chanting by a beggar-soldier (Max Ernst), who then makes a long journey back to his hideout. He informs his fellow beggar-soldiers that the "Mallorcans" have arrived and it is time to bear arms and fight. But this small group of soldiers is weak and exhausted through starvation, and only one of them survives the trip back. The Mallorcans, a caravan of wealthy dignitaries and their servants, arrive to lay a cornerstone commemorating the now skeletal archbishops. The ceremony is interrupted by the screams of lovemaking, and the couple is separated by gendarmes and led away. The man (Gaston Modot), whom we later learn is a government official of some standing, establishes his nasty and anti-social character through the kicking a dog. The ceremony continues; a title card identifies this as the foundation of Imperial Rome. The next sequence intercuts scenes of the girl (Lya Lys), who is the daughter of a wealthy marquis, lost in a world of erotic fantasy, with scenes of the man being led down the street by the gendarmes. The man finally produces diplomatic papers, and is released.

The marquis (Ibanez) and marquise (Germaine Noizet) throw a large party at their villa, where a number of strange events occur without the slightest notice from the guests. A momentary distraction is caused when the gamekeeper shoots his son over a minor incident. The government official arrives at the party and is soon in pursuit of the girl, although the social nature of the event, at first, keeps them apart. The marquise accidentally spills a little wine over the government official's hand, and he slaps her, exciting the girl. (Alfred Hitchcock would later echo this very scene in Strangers on a Train.) The girl and the government official are finally allowed to consummate their fetishistic desires to the strains of Wagner in an extended love scene in the garden. This is interrupted when the conductor (Duchange) of the concert nearby has a headache and walks off the podium, directly into the arms of the girl. The government official gets a phone call, where he is told that his actions have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of the "women, children, and old people" he is sworn to protect. He curses the caller, and enraged, he goes to his apartment to rip apart pillows and to hurl several objects, including an archbishop, out the window. The final sequence begins with a series of lengthy, and increasingly agitated, intertitles announcing that the Duc de Blangis (Lionel Salem) and his henchmen are due to emerge from 120 days of debauchery inside a secluded castle. When the party does emerge, the duke is seen to be missing his beard. ~ David Lewis, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Gaston ModotLya Lys, (more)
Director(s):
Luis Buñuel
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Synopsis of L'Age d'Or

L'Âge d'Or begins as a documentary about the habits of scorpions, utilizing library footage and silent-style intertitles. Amid the rocks of an inlet, archbishops are seen chanting by a beggar-soldier (Max Ernst), who then makes a long journey back to his hideout. He informs his fellow beggar-soldiers that the "Mallorcans" have arrived and it is time to bear arms and fight. But this small group of soldiers is weak and exhausted through starvation, and only one of them survives the trip back. The Mallorcans, a caravan of wealthy dignitaries and their servants, arrive to lay a cornerstone commemorating the now skeletal archbishops. The ceremony is interrupted by the screams of lovemaking, and the couple is separated by gendarmes and led away. The man (Gaston Modot), whom we later learn is a government official of some standing, establishes his nasty and anti-social character through the kicking a dog. The ceremony continues; a title card identifies this as the foundation of Imperial Rome. The next sequence intercuts scenes of the girl (Lya Lys), who is the daughter of a wealthy marquis, lost in a world of erotic fantasy, with scenes of the man being led down the street by the gendarmes. The man finally produces diplomatic papers, and is released.

The marquis (Ibanez) and marquise (Germaine Noizet) throw a large party at their villa, where a number of strange events occur without the slightest notice from the guests. A momentary distraction is caused when the gamekeeper shoots his son over a minor incident. The government official arrives at the party and is soon in pursuit of the girl, although the social nature of the event, at first, keeps them apart. The marquise accidentally spills a little wine over the government official's hand, and he slaps her, exciting the girl. (Alfred Hitchcock would later echo this very scene in Strangers on a Train.) The girl and the government official are finally allowed to consummate their fetishistic desires to the strains of Wagner in an extended love scene in the garden. This is interrupted when the conductor (Duchange) of the concert nearby has a headache and walks off the podium, directly into the arms of the girl. The government official gets a phone call, where he is told that his actions have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of the "women, children, and old people" he is sworn to protect. He curses the caller, and enraged, he goes to his apartment to rip apart pillows and to hurl several objects, including an archbishop, out the window. The final sequence begins with a series of lengthy, and increasingly agitated, intertitles announcing that the Duc de Blangis (Lionel Salem) and his henchmen are due to emerge from 120 days of debauchery inside a secluded castle. When the party does emerge, the duke is seen to be missing his beard. ~ David Lewis, Rovi

Theatrical Feature Running Time:
63 mins

Complete Cast of L'Age d'Or


Director(s):
Luis Buñuel
Writer(s):
Luis BuñuelSalvador Dali
Categories:
Special Interest
Looking for special editions of L'Age d'Or?
See All Versions
Subtitles:
Check All Versions
Closed Captioning:
Check All Versions
 
 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Debra K.

    This film is a must-see classic of surrealism. The filming is state-of-the-art c.1930, but the narrative, the realizing action and images remain curious and compelling, at times disturbing, even today. One of cinema's marvelous qualities -- its capacity to treat as ordinary the extraordinary -- is employed to great advantage here. As with much of the work of the surrealist artists collaborating in this film, one is finally left with a thoroughly ambiguous object, given a somewhat cryptic title. The multiple trains of thought evoked can leave the viewer unresolved, confused, or at the very least, multivalent. Film as dreamwork has not yet been exhausted as a theme, metathematic organizing principle, or set of techniques. Returning to this classic repays the cinemaphile amply with its affecting provocation to thought, and reminds us of what surrealism was about -- that very provocation itself.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Fernando R.

    It's unlikely that today's viewer will feel compelled to throw things at the screen and riot, like in Paris 70 years ago, but this masterpiece will still startle and captivate with its singularly compelling images. While not necessarily as assaultive as Bunuel and Dali's first collaboration, it may well be even more disturbing in its graceful manner of turning fundemental emotions into fringe behaviors. Best of all, Bunuel's sly sense of humor has never been so charged. Hollywood may be the dream factory, but this potent piece of surrealism gets beneath the surface like nothing else that's ever been filmed.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Christopher S.

    Don't try to make sense of this film. Just appreciate it like you would a weird dream.This is a must-see for fans of Surrealism. The imagery is memorable and compelling. I would have given it five stars if I had not already seen how much better Dali's first film with Bunuel had been. In the present film, the narrative (or semblance of a narrative) gets in the way of the jarring random images that made the previous film a classic. For those who have not seen the other film, and for those who are new to Surrealist film, this might be a good introduction to the genre because, for all its weirdness, there is something resembling a story.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 6 Reviews