Movies Similar to The Birth of a Nation (1915)

The Birth of a Nation (1915)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
The most successful and artistically advanced film of its time, The Birth of a Nation has also sparked protests, riots, and divisiveness since its first release. The film tells the story of the Civil War and its aftermath, as seen through the eyes of two families. The Stonemans hail from the North, the Camerons from the South. When war breaks out, the Stonemans cast their lot with the Union, while the Camerons are loyal to Dixie. After the war, Ben Cameron (Henry B. Walthall), distressed that his beloved south is now under the rule of blacks and carpetbaggers, organizes several like-minded Southerners into a secret vigilante group called the Ku Klux Klan. When Cameron's beloved younger sister Flora (Mae Marsh) leaps to her death rather than surrender to the lustful advances of renegade slave Gus (Walter Long), the Klan wages war on the new Northern-inspired government and ultimately restores "order" to the South. In the original prints, Griffith suggested that the black population be shipped to Liberia, citing Abraham Lincoln as the inspiration for this ethnic cleansing. Showings of Birth of a Nation were picketed and boycotted from the start, and as recently as 1995, Turner Classic Movies cancelled a showing of a restored print in the wake of the racial tensions around the O.J. Simpson trial verdict. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Henry B. WalthallMiriam Cooper, (more)
Director(s):
D.W. Griffith
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
G
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
BuyPreviously Viewed   $6.39
(disc only) 

New  $15.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Kevin Burton S.

    Everything they say about this film is true: it's about as racist and ignorant an American movie as I've seen, insulting to anyone with even half a brain. Yet its historical cinematic importance can't be denied either. The first part (the "war" section) is impressive in its ambitions, particularly the battlefield scenes, albeit boring after a while. The “reconstruction” half is far more interesting, as the characters introduced previously finally start to be fleshed out. Unfortunately, the racist overtones only hinted previosly also come home to roost so that even as you become caught up in a decent (if melodramatic) adventure, you can’t help but squirm at the hateful (and historically dubious) propaganda being dished out. If you're at all interested in American film, history or the long, sad ocean of racism we're all swimming in, see this film. Censor it? Hide it from view like a particularly ugly child? No. Rather it should be seen and discussed openly. It would be a start...

    Yes   |   No

     
    Eric B.

    For a movie over 90 years old it is amazing. Granted the perspective of the film maker and of the screenwriter is bad, pro-slavery, it still is worth watching

    Yes   |   No

     
    WhytMist W.

    this goes along with sitting quietly for a moment...I didn't know in those day's; quiet calm came in so many hues of black and white..red was heavily used to suggest something; I was too busy blinking to refocus...of course, the one thing was having white people play the roles of blacks...I though this is crazy, but when I went in the Army, discrimination was still going on...I almost got booted out for using the "black bathroom and drinking fountain"...this was in 1959(?) so these things did happen and I thought it was a movie about the dust bowl and the move West...well color me red..the silence was nice...all I needed was a small fire and a sip of moonshine and it would have been like a bad dream but no one likes to see how it really was...?

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 22 Reviews