DCSIMG
 
 

Movies Similar to On Valentine's Day (1986)

On Valentine's Day (1986)
Member Rating:  
A prequel to Horton Foote's 1918, On Valentine's Day was filmed in 1984, then held back from release till 1986. On the titular day, Elizabeth Vaughn (Hallie Foote, Horton's daughter) and Horace Robedeaux (William Converse-Roberts) elope. Horace stubbornly refuses to ask for financial assistant from his parents or in-laws, so the penniless couple is compelled to live in an inexpensive boarding house. Their fellow tenants are the usual assortment of eccentrics, including alcoholic Bobby Pate (Richard Jenkins), spinster Miss Ruth (Carol Goodheart), heartbroken George Tyler (Steven Hill) and garrulous young Bessie (Jeanne McCarthy). After several months of enduring the woes of the other boarders, Horace swallows his pride and agrees to allow father-in-law Michael Higgins to support him and Elizabeth. There's a reconciliation, but one tinged with the premonition that Horace and Elizabeth aren't out of the woods yet. Together with Portrait of a Marriage (never released theatrically), On Valentine's Day and 1918 were later reedited and incorporated into a Horton Foote TV trilogy on the PBS network. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
William Converse-RobertsHallie Foote, (more)
Director(s):
Ken Harrison
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
PG
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Adrian W.

    This seems to be a made-for-TV movie created without much care for good film quality. This was bothersome. Also be aware, it is a painfully slow movie that is nearly 100% very slow conversations. This is one of Matthew Broderick's first movies and in it he plays an uninteresting slime-ball son. But for that matter, none of the other characters is especially interesting. Look for something else.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Stephen P.

    I enjoyed this movie. It had a good-acting cast and believable. A lot better picture than expected.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Joseph W.

    I'm in a rut lately. I've either been looking at too many movies or can't get caught up in the rhythym of this movie - I just wached this again. I must be sleep waking and adding new movies in my sleep

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 6 Reviews