Movies Similar to Blood for Dracula (1973)

Blood for Dracula (1973)
Member Rating:  
The second of two horror films shot in a single production term and bearing the name of pop-art icon Andy Warhol (whose participation pretty much ended with the use of his name), this film is slightly superior to its higher-profile predecessor, Andy Warhol's Frankenstein. Direction is credited to Warhol factory filmmaker Paul Morrissey, though there still exists a very vocal camp who insist that the real credit should go to Italian director Antonio Margheriti. Euro-horror leading man Udo Kier assays the title role, playing the count as a pale, anemic-looking blood junkie with an overwrought accent. Finding the supply of "weer-gin" blood diminishing rapidly in Romania, Dracula is forced to seek a fix in a predominantly Catholic Italian province, where he is certain a few virgins still exist. He travels with his assistant (Arno Juerging) and his coffin-sealed sister to the decrepit, crumbling mansion of the financially-strapped Marquis DiFore (a tour-de-force performance from Bicycle Thief director Vittorio de Sica) who welcomes the affluent Count with open arms, hoping to marry off any one of his four daughters. Dracula clearly has other intentions for the girls... but his plans are rudely thwarted by beefy, socialist handyman Mario (Joe Dallesandro), who has been dutifully divesting the young maidens of their -- ahem -- virtue, thus tainting their blood and making it unsafe for vampiric consumption. Very unsafe, it turns out -- as we are treated to protracted scenes of the death-pale Count vomiting up gallons of blood. Rated "X" at the time of its release (and subsequently re-rated "R" ten years later), this outrageous catalogue of depravity features wildly campy performances, inane dialogue and an outrageous climax. ~ Cavett Binion, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Joe DallesandroUdo Kier, (more)
Director(s):
Paul Morrissey
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Robert R.

    I agree this isn't funny like "Flesh For Frankenstein". There isn't even much reason to watch this out of intellectual curiosity for comparison's sake. Warhol created a sensation back in the day. But, as bad as these productions were then, they hold up even worse today. There is nothing compelling in this film, really. It's just another ribald take on a classic horror theme. It was more of a Drive-In movie kind of flick.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Shawn H.

    Not as funny as "Flesh For Frankenstein", although the dismemberment at the end was a hoot...

    Yes   |   No

     
    James L.

    A typical Andy Warhol movie. The movie is located somewhere in Europe (Italy I think) and the gardener has a Bronx accent! Don't know if it was real or suppose to be so bad to appear fake. Love how he turns green from "bad blood". Plus learn the other uses for a loaf of bread!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 5 Reviews