Seconds (1966) Reviews

Seconds (1966)
Member Rating:  
Arthur Hamilton (John Randolph) is a listless Manhattan businessman who lives with his wife in the New York suburbs. One day, he runs into an old friend (Murray Hamilton) whom he thought had died. The friend leads him to The Company, a secretive operation run by The Old Man (Will Geer). The Company is a high-tech service which, for a price, provides older men with plastic surgery, a beefed-up body, and a fresh start in life. To cover the "disappearance," a middle-aged male cadaver is "killed" in a hotel fire. Hamilton submits to the operation that will turn him into a "Second," and when the bandages are removed, he's shed twenty years, renamed Tony Wilson and portrayed by Rock Hudson. The Company creates a new identity for Hamilton, relocating him in a hedonistic California beach community with an identity as a painter. Celebrating during a local wine festival, Hamilton has his revelry cut short when he learns that all his new young friends are Seconds like himself and suddenly feels trapped in these surroundings. Unfortunately, finding a way out isn't nearly as easy as it was to find a way in. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Rock HudsonSalome Jens, (more)
Director(s):
John Frankenheimer
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  | Digital SD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(14 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Marion A.

this is a very well made movie, WAY ahead of its time, kind of falls in the "the Game"category. I enjoyed watching it, good rental, was not a "typical" Rock Hudson flick by any means

Yes   |   No


Lauralyn F.

Strong and stylish B&W cinematography. The movie is primarily a morality tale, rather than a believable story with convincing characters. It reminded me of the Twilight Zone: Rod Serling could have introduced the film with, "For your consideration..." I didn't care for it greatly, but if you're a "student" of movies you'll find it worthwhile. It's unique for that era of Hollywood, and very well done.

Yes   |   No


Glenn T.

Excellent movie - Rock Hudson in a new way.

Yes   |   No


Elissa W.

A creepy but good thriller!

Yes   |   No


TOM Z.

I'm not sure I know how to describe this movie...it's as though Alfred Hitchcock,Orson Welles and some fantasy author collaborated,and we get the most bizarre Rock Hudson movie on the planet!

Yes   |   No


Elizabeth K.

When it came out, I saw this in a double bill with Psycho. Psycho was a laugh after seeing Seconds. It is excellent.

Yes   |   No


Jean S.

Woefully short of being clearly defined. The viewer is likely to end this movie asking "What was that about?"

Yes   |   No


Warren A.

Slow and boring. Had a hard time figuring if there was ever going to be anything suspensful, Black and white didn't help either. This one would be good to delete from Rock Hudson's archives.

Yes   |   No


Lynn P.

I thought it was strange at best and distasteful at least. I realize it is an old movie, but I thought it was tacky. I especially didn't like the vineyard scene with a bunch of naked ladies and men having an orgy in the grapes being smashed to make the wine...yuck!!! Call me prude, but wasn't necessary!

Yes   |   No


Scott W.

I can't recommend it because of the one scene with nudity - very poor taste that ruined an otherwise interesting story.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 3 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Marion A.

    this is a very well made movie, WAY ahead of its time, kind of falls in the "the Game"category. I enjoyed watching it, good rental, was not a "typical" Rock Hudson flick by any means

    Yes   |   No

     
    Lauralyn F.

    Strong and stylish B&W cinematography. The movie is primarily a morality tale, rather than a believable story with convincing characters. It reminded me of the Twilight Zone: Rod Serling could have introduced the film with, "For your consideration..." I didn't care for it greatly, but if you're a "student" of movies you'll find it worthwhile. It's unique for that era of Hollywood, and very well done.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Glenn T.

    Excellent movie - Rock Hudson in a new way.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 14 Reviews