The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1939) Reviews

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1939)
Member Rating:  
Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce make their second screen appearances as Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. Ostensibly based on the stage play by William Gillette, the film owes nothing to the play beyond the characters of Holmes, Watson, Billy the page boy and Professor Moriarty. Played with relish (and a bit of pickle) by George Zucco, Moriarty plots to steal the Crown Jewels, and also to confound Holmes by obliging the Great Detective to be in two places at once. Ida Lupino costars as an imperiled young woman who is seemingly plagued by an ancient family curse--a plot development that has been carefully stage-managed by the malevolent Moriarty. Basil Rathbone is excellent not only as Holmes but also in the guise of a cockney music-hall entertainer (if indeed that is Rathbone performing a buck-and-wing in longshot). The second of Twentieth Century-Fox's Holmes films (Hound of the Baskervilles was the first), The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes was the last in which Rathbone and Bruce were seen in a 19th century setting. In the subsquent Sherlock Holmes series at Universal, the exploits of Holmes and Watson were updated to the World War II years. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Basil RathboneNigel Bruce, (more)
Director(s):
Alfred L. Werker
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(6 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Chris D.

While the lovable bumbling Nigel Bruce has come to epitomize Watson, he has nothing in common with heroic Dr. Watson created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, except maybe that they are both doctors. True fans of Sherlock Holmes can only cringe at Bruce's interpretation. The Plot also has none of the mystery of Sherlock Holmes. Moriarty gives away almost his entire plan at the beginning leaving Holmes without a single deduction that the audience has not already made long before. The true genius of Sherlock Holme's stories is watching Holmes take a number of small clues that lead to implausible deductions which when afterward explained by Holmes seem completely and utterly reasonable. I still wait for the definitive Sherlock Holmes which takes the original stories and makes them as exciting on screen as they are to read. If that is what you are looking for, this movie is a flop.

Yes   |   No


Vickie S.

I'm a hugh Sherlock Holmes fan, but only the movies with Basil Rathbone & Nigel Bruce. The b/w movies are crisp and wonderful to watch. The commentary you can add to the viewing is somewhat annoying only because the movie sound continues to play in the background. Otherwise, the biography provides helpful information about the actors, story line and deleted scenes.

Yes   |   No


Joe P.

I like the old Basil Rathbone version of Sherlock, not the modernized silliness of Downey Jr. as much as I like him as an actor.

Yes   |   No


Richard M.

excellent Sherlock Holmes

Yes   |   No


Teresa u R.

I have been a fan of Basil Rathbone for some time. Enjoyed this movie and will request more with a similar story. For me movies are intended for entertainment and not all of them are poignant and dramatic.

Yes   |   No


Jennifer W.

Worst entry in the Basil Rathbone/Sherlock Holmes series.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $15.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Chris D.

    While the lovable bumbling Nigel Bruce has come to epitomize Watson, he has nothing in common with heroic Dr. Watson created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, except maybe that they are both doctors. True fans of Sherlock Holmes can only cringe at Bruce's interpretation. The Plot also has none of the mystery of Sherlock Holmes. Moriarty gives away almost his entire plan at the beginning leaving Holmes without a single deduction that the audience has not already made long before. The true genius of Sherlock Holme's stories is watching Holmes take a number of small clues that lead to implausible deductions which when afterward explained by Holmes seem completely and utterly reasonable. I still wait for the definitive Sherlock Holmes which takes the original stories and makes them as exciting on screen as they are to read. If that is what you are looking for, this movie is a flop.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Vickie S.

    I'm a hugh Sherlock Holmes fan, but only the movies with Basil Rathbone & Nigel Bruce. The b/w movies are crisp and wonderful to watch. The commentary you can add to the viewing is somewhat annoying only because the movie sound continues to play in the background. Otherwise, the biography provides helpful information about the actors, story line and deleted scenes.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Joe P.

    I like the old Basil Rathbone version of Sherlock, not the modernized silliness of Downey Jr. as much as I like him as an actor.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 6 Reviews