C.H.U.D. (1984) Reviews

C.H.U.D. (1984)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
People are disappearing all over the Big Apple. Nobody cares, though, because most of the missing are homeless. But when investigative reporter Murphy (J.C. Quinn) tips off principled photographer George Cooper (John Heard) to a government conspiracy involving the dumping of nuclear waste beneath the streets, Cooper decides to dig a little deeper. Soon he discovers the existence of C.H.U.D.s, or "Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers," derelicts who have become grotesque monsters after being exposed to the mountains of hazardous waste. Meanwhile, Captain Bosch (Christopher Curry), a cop whose wife is among the missing, forms an unlikely alliance with the Reverend (Daniel Stern), a leftist soup-kitchen cook who knows the score. Murphy, Cooper, Bosch, and the Reverend soon run up against the stonewalling tactics of Wilson (George Martin), a government toadie. As the titular monsters begin to tire of their underground habitat, the protagonists -- including Cooper's wife, beautiful model Lauren Daniels (Kim Greist) -- face a race against time to defeat not only the C.H.U.D.s, but the government's cover-up. The debut, and only film, from writer Parnell Hall and director Douglas Cheek, C.H.U.D. was followed by 1989's C.H.U.D. 2: Bud the C.H.U.D. Co-stars Stern and Heard would later appear together in the first two Home Alone pictures, while Curry would appear in the third. ~ Brian J. Dillard, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
John HeardKim Greist, (more)
Director(s):
Douglas Cheek
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(18 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Laura P.

Blood: 1/2 Cheese Factor: 5+ Acting: 2 1/2 Overall: 3 Ok first and formost I pose you this question, how many actors from 'Home Alone' make their debut in this film? Besides that, this movie was very slow paced in the begining but by the end of the movie it had me saying, "Well I guess it was an okay movie.' (Considering the extremely high cheese factor and that its a 'monster' movie) If you're looking for an oscar winning movie or even a serious horror movie skip this one.

Yes   |   No


Chris D.

To be honest I only rented this movie so that I could rightfully use the term Chud in conversation. I realized I had been using it for years without ever seeing the movie. It was about what I expected, but with a lot more surprising, "hey, it's that guy moments" than I thought it would contain. What's John Goodman doing in this movie? If you rent it, watch the commentary track. It was apparently made very recently.

Yes   |   No


Tony R.

This was classic for it's time. I loved it. Don't get into the special effects. There really isn't any by todays standard, and the acting is OK. It's just one of those movies that you either love or hate and you just have to take a chance. I will tell you though, if you lived during that time you get the feel of it better. Especially if you lived in New York. But then again, that's just me and the way I feel about this flick.

Yes   |   No


Asha A.

Wow, this was a bad one. The acting is AWFUL. The creature is laughable. So why the 2 1/2 star rating and not a 0? Well, here's the catch. Some movies are really awful that you just hate them and have to turn it off. CHUD on the other hand falls into the catagory of being so bad it's entertaining. I was still entertained to some degree and that counts for something..

Yes   |   No


Chris W.

Nice little random Grateful Dead reference in this flick. More 80's horror fun that will keep you entertained if you're fan of the era.

Yes   |   No


Jeff H.

I enjoy watching this movie when I can. Chud part 2 is a lame sequel.

Yes   |   No


Rosie P.

Cannabolistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers. Awesome creature feature!!

Yes   |   No


Samuel F.

VARY GOOD MOVIE

Yes   |   No


Mike O.

I'm an 80's B horror nut,and I did'nt like it.It was to borring.

Yes   |   No


Roxanna P.

total and complete waste of 96 minutes. the special effects were cheap, acting was cheesy

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $7.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Laura P.

    Blood: 1/2 Cheese Factor: 5+ Acting: 2 1/2 Overall: 3 Ok first and formost I pose you this question, how many actors from 'Home Alone' make their debut in this film? Besides that, this movie was very slow paced in the begining but by the end of the movie it had me saying, "Well I guess it was an okay movie.' (Considering the extremely high cheese factor and that its a 'monster' movie) If you're looking for an oscar winning movie or even a serious horror movie skip this one.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Chris D.

    To be honest I only rented this movie so that I could rightfully use the term Chud in conversation. I realized I had been using it for years without ever seeing the movie. It was about what I expected, but with a lot more surprising, "hey, it's that guy moments" than I thought it would contain. What's John Goodman doing in this movie? If you rent it, watch the commentary track. It was apparently made very recently.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Tony R.

    This was classic for it's time. I loved it. Don't get into the special effects. There really isn't any by todays standard, and the acting is OK. It's just one of those movies that you either love or hate and you just have to take a chance. I will tell you though, if you lived during that time you get the feel of it better. Especially if you lived in New York. But then again, that's just me and the way I feel about this flick.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 18 Reviews