The Bourne Identity (1988) Reviews

The Bourne Identity (1988)
Member Rating:  
Roger Young's made-for-TV adaptation of the Robert Ludlum novel, The Bourne Identity stars Richard Chamberlain as Jason Bourne, who washes up on the beach and is cared for by a doctor. Bourne has no memories, but is intrigued enough to investigate why he has the number of a Swiss bank account on his thigh. As Jason travels to various European cities following clues about his past, he begins to discover that his actions match those of the feared international terrorist Carlos. The book was filmed a second time in 2002 by Doug Liman with Matt Damon in the title role. ~ Perry Seibert, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Richard ChamberlainJaclyn Smith, (more)
Director(s):
Roger Young
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(16 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Patrick A.

It is probably hard to appreciate this original Bourne saga after you have been taken on the wild, action packed adventure with Matt Damon. There is simply no comparison. In all fairness, this is 1988, and the concept of the story is intriguing. The movie is a bit drawn out, slows at times, and appears a bit hammy but worth watching to see the differences between the original and the remake.

Yes   |   No


LEANNE D.

This film doesn't really grab you, and while Chamberlain and Smith are OK, they may have been somewhat miscast in their roles. I would like to visit the parts of Europe where gunplay continues uninterrupted by any police presence, and I would also like to lay my hands on one of those revolvers that is chambered for eight or nine rounds.

Yes   |   No


Hannah M.

Well, I have to say it was terrible. Long, drawn out, like watching a bad soap opera. I guess thats why it was "made for TV". Richard Chamberlain as Jason Bourne is terrible. He isn't believable, and he isn't in anyway heroic, I found myself wishing the "bad guys" would just catch him.

Yes   |   No


Nancie A.

People who give a review should learn how to spell. It was OK.. I've seen better but I've also seen much worse.

Yes   |   No


Jimmy J.

I'm starting to think here. Not quite, but starting to, okay?

Yes   |   No


John H.

i was wondering why this movie was so bad until i read the other reviews about it being made for tv. i used to like Mr. RC as Dr kildare, but he had aged horribly and was truly not the correct cast member for the part. he would have made a much better bad guy. his acting was so stilted as was the incomprehensible number of bloodletting/shootouts. where is a cop when you need one as there was no regard for how many innocent civilians were being shot. go back to medicine or australia, Mr RC

Yes   |   No


Portia Milan S.

It may seem redundant but I have to agree with the other reviews, this movie wasn't very interesting from the point of view of the editing, the background music, the lighting and the acting. The settings lacked variety. The action scenes lacked excitment. In short, if you watched it once you won't want to watch it again.

Yes   |   No


Matthew L.

Greetings, This movie was very difficult to watch. Yes it follows the plot of the book, but it does so without taking up the spirit and soul of the book. The book is exciting, intriguing, and a real page turner. The movie will make you wish you had never started. I watched it through, because like a bad train wreck it's hard to look away. Mr. Chamberlain unbelieveable as Jason Bourne. Mr. Damon was also unbeliveable as Jason Bourne. One of those two is a compliment, stick with Matt Damon for a great movie. Read the book for a great story. They are both enjoyable, while this movie was terrible. -matt

Yes   |   No


Aaron R.

followed book more than movie but the movie with Matt Damon was still overall better

Yes   |   No


Amy A.

i actually recieved the wrong movie for this one so i never saw it

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Patrick A.

    It is probably hard to appreciate this original Bourne saga after you have been taken on the wild, action packed adventure with Matt Damon. There is simply no comparison. In all fairness, this is 1988, and the concept of the story is intriguing. The movie is a bit drawn out, slows at times, and appears a bit hammy but worth watching to see the differences between the original and the remake.

    Yes   |   No

     
    LEANNE D.

    This film doesn't really grab you, and while Chamberlain and Smith are OK, they may have been somewhat miscast in their roles. I would like to visit the parts of Europe where gunplay continues uninterrupted by any police presence, and I would also like to lay my hands on one of those revolvers that is chambered for eight or nine rounds.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Hannah M.

    Well, I have to say it was terrible. Long, drawn out, like watching a bad soap opera. I guess thats why it was "made for TV". Richard Chamberlain as Jason Bourne is terrible. He isn't believable, and he isn't in anyway heroic, I found myself wishing the "bad guys" would just catch him.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 16 Reviews