Blow Out (1981) Reviews

Blow Out (1981)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Brian De Palma's homage to Michelangelo Antonioni's classic art movie Blow-Up (1966) blends suspense and political paranoia when a Philadelphia soundman inadvertently records a murder. Former police technician Jack Terri (John Travolta) makes his living doing sound for slasher flicks. While recording new outdoor effects one night, Jack witnesses a couple's car careen off a bridge into a river, but he can save only the female occupant, Sally (Nancy Allen). Jack begins to suspect something when he learns that her dead companion was a Presidential hopeful. Re-playing his tape over and over, Jack thinks that he hears a gun shot before the crash-causing tire blow-out. When sleazy photographer Manny Karp (Dennis Franz) comes forward with photos of the accident, Jack discovers the real reason that the naïve Sally was in the car -- and also a way to prove his auditory suspicions through motion pictures. Even with all his surveillance talent, however, Jack cannot see (or hear) how dangerous the big picture really is until it's too late. Taking a break from horror films, De Palma turned his interests in technology and voyeurism toward more politically loaded subject matter at the dawn of the Reagan era; the film's red, white and blue mise-en-scène, "Liberty Day" celebration climax, and conspiracy surrounding political "dirty tricks" suggest that American politics are still rotten, seven years after Watergate. Although Blow Out earned some favorable notice, particularly for Travolta's first "adult" performance, De Palma's downbeat film did not go over well with 1981 summer audiences. Rather than blockbuster escapism, Blow Out instead harks back to 1970s political thrillers like The Parallax View (1974), using cinematic fireworks to tell an unsettling story about one man's struggle against unstoppable corruption. ~ Lucia Bozzola, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
John TravoltaNancy Allen, (more)
Director(s):
Brian De Palma
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(33 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Steven B.

This is essentially and B movie, elevated slightly by good performances from it's two main actors (Travolta and Allen). But it's a B movie. In script, in direction, and certainly in the horrid soundtrack which is badly editted into the film...along with rather poor sound effects. But then, as I said, it's a B movie. It's obvious this film is done on a low budget and DePalma did a half-assed job by making it look cheaper than it might otherwise have looked. Like it was it was his first film, and he was trying to copy a low-budget European film from the 50's. The script was ok for a B film. Almost anything worthy of note was predictable, including the ending. Given some rather glowing reviews of this film, I had expected something far above what little this film actually has to offer...and so was natrually disappointed.

Yes   |   No


Tuff L.

Tuff Love - Contrary to the opinion of another reviewer, who may or may not have ever passed their film class(es), I think this movie rocks! One of the better crime thrillers to jump out of the 60s, featuring Travolta as a semi-tortured artist/sound tech (instead of a ladies man) who "overhears" a murder a la Chappaquiddick. Nancy Allen spanks her role as the modern archetypal prostitute victim and John Lithgow does it up like only Lithgow can, as the skin crawling serial killer. You also get a spoonful of Dennis Franz to spice up this raw and saucy release.

Yes   |   No


Becky R.

The one thing that is good abbout this film is the stylised look at sound in cinema. It's fascinating to draw attention to how every sound is manufactured and the only reason it is heard is a specific choice made on the part of the director. I've seen this film several times as required for different film classes. As far as issues with DePalma, it's hard to say whether he really is a misogynist or somehow commenting on women's role as victim within the context of cinema. Overall, the film is quite predictable and even laughable in many scenes. The dialogue is ridiculous and the acting sub-par at best. The slick and stylized direction as well as some innovative uses of the camera and sound is what saves this movie.

Yes   |   No


Michael S.

If you noticed all the previous reviews were by women- they tend not to either understand DePalma or have issues with his movies; great ending to a movie- would not see that in a movie today; if you enjoy his films, you will like this one. Nancy Allen is not that bad- Jeez

Yes   |   No


Jeff H.

I really enjoyed this movie. Though not one of Brian's best movies. But a movie worth watching.

Yes   |   No


Keith B.

The same classic it's always been. I've never been thrilled with where the ending left off, but in a way it's trademark 'DePalma. A shame bringing it to blu-ray wasn't as effective as it should have been as the huge environments would have been outstanding and an un-deniable difference. If you like the classic thriller mystery then this is one you won't want to miss.

Yes   |   No


Naomi M.

It was definetly an older movie. It was to predictable and the acting was bad.

Yes   |   No


Monique B.

This was by far the worst performance I have seen by Nancy Allen. Was this the movie that ended her career? The music score for this film made it almost unbearable to sit through the entire movie.....It's amazing how far the movie industry has come in 24-years!

Yes   |   No


Betty Anne B.

Don't waste your time on this one. Nancy Allen's acting, particularly her voice, was SO annoying, I had to stop the movie & put it back in the mail.

Yes   |   No


Anne B.

Nancy Allen ~ could she possibly make this movie any worse? The fact that John Travolta was in it was the only reason I tolerated watching the first 20 minutes. This movie was a complete waste of time and talent.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  from $10.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Steven B.

    This is essentially and B movie, elevated slightly by good performances from it's two main actors (Travolta and Allen). But it's a B movie. In script, in direction, and certainly in the horrid soundtrack which is badly editted into the film...along with rather poor sound effects. But then, as I said, it's a B movie. It's obvious this film is done on a low budget and DePalma did a half-assed job by making it look cheaper than it might otherwise have looked. Like it was it was his first film, and he was trying to copy a low-budget European film from the 50's. The script was ok for a B film. Almost anything worthy of note was predictable, including the ending. Given some rather glowing reviews of this film, I had expected something far above what little this film actually has to offer...and so was natrually disappointed.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Tuff L.

    Tuff Love - Contrary to the opinion of another reviewer, who may or may not have ever passed their film class(es), I think this movie rocks! One of the better crime thrillers to jump out of the 60s, featuring Travolta as a semi-tortured artist/sound tech (instead of a ladies man) who "overhears" a murder a la Chappaquiddick. Nancy Allen spanks her role as the modern archetypal prostitute victim and John Lithgow does it up like only Lithgow can, as the skin crawling serial killer. You also get a spoonful of Dennis Franz to spice up this raw and saucy release.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Becky R.

    The one thing that is good abbout this film is the stylised look at sound in cinema. It's fascinating to draw attention to how every sound is manufactured and the only reason it is heard is a specific choice made on the part of the director. I've seen this film several times as required for different film classes. As far as issues with DePalma, it's hard to say whether he really is a misogynist or somehow commenting on women's role as victim within the context of cinema. Overall, the film is quite predictable and even laughable in many scenes. The dialogue is ridiculous and the acting sub-par at best. The slick and stylized direction as well as some innovative uses of the camera and sound is what saves this movie.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 33 Reviews