DCSIMG
 
 

The War of the Worlds (1953) Reviews

The War of the Worlds (1953)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
H.G. Wells's War of the Worlds had been on the Paramount Pictures docket since the silent era, when it was optioned as a potential Cecil B. DeMille production. When Paramount finally got around to a filming the Wells novel, the property was firmly in the hands of special-effects maestro George Pal. Like Orson Welles's infamous 1938 radio adaptation, the film eschews Wells's original Victorian England setting for a contemporary American locale, in this case Southern California. A meteorlike object crash-lands near the small town of Linda Rosa. Among the crowd of curious onlookers is Pacific Tech scientist Gene Barry, who strikes up a friendship with Ann Robinson, the niece of local minister Lewis Martin. Because the meteor is too hot to approach at present, Barry decides to wait a few days to investigate, leaving three townsmen to guard the strange, glowing object. Left alone, the three men decide to approach the meterorite, and are evaporated for their trouble. It turns out that this is no meteorite, but an invading spaceship from the planet Mars. The hideous-looking Martians utilize huge, mushroomlike flying ships, equipped with heat rays, to pursue the helpless earthlings. When the military is called in, the Martians demonstrate their ruthlessness by "zapping" Ann's minister uncle, who'd hoped to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the standoff. As Barry and Ann seek shelter, the Martians go on a destructive rampage. Nothing-not even an atom-bomb blast-can halt the Martian death machines. The film's climax occurs in a besieged Los Angeles, where Barry fights through a crowd of refugees and looters so that he may be reunited with Ann in Earth's last moments of existence. In the end, the Martians are defeated not by science or the military, but by bacteria germs-or, to quote H.G. Wells, "the humblest things that God in his wisdom has put upon the earth." Forty years' worth of progressively improving special effects have not dimmed the brilliance of George Pal's War of the Worlds. Even on television, Pal's Oscar-winning camera trickery is awesome to behold. So indelible an impression has this film made on modern-day sci-fi mavens that, when a 1988 TV version of War of the Worlds was put together, it was conceived as a direct sequel to the 1953 film, rather than a derivation of the Wells novel or the Welles radio production. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Gene BarryAnn Robinson, (more)
Director(s):
Byron Haskin
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
G
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(28 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Dana V.

This is the movie that terrified me as a child and had me shivering under the covers in the night with imagined aliens outside...much easier to watch as an adult.

Yes   |   No


Jan P.

I love this movie and I love the Day the Earth Stood Still. This isn't like the new movie, this is better!

Yes   |   No


Timothy V.

This is it folks, the classic War of the Worlds movie! Negative reviews of this movie were most likely written by those whose concept of movie history extends back to what they watched yesterday. The special effects in this movie may look cheesy by today's standards, but they were cutting edge in 1953. I will watch this movie again and again.

Yes   |   No


Jeffrey M.

1/2 star! Are you kidding?! This is a great movie for sci-fi fans! This movie, along with most of the sci-fi movies of the 1950's, was a reflection of the times. McCarthyism and the Cold War, shaped how Hollywood made movies. A lot of the underlying themes of these movies was fear of an unknown enemy, the unseen aliens (the Martians, in this case) unleash a surprise attack (the real threat of World War III) upon the world. Only by Nature's hand, were the aliens defeated. Yeah, go ahead and compare the special effects of 2005 Hollywood to 1953 Hollywood. C'mon...That's 52 years of differences in special effect techniques, CGI (though there were NO CGI effects in 1953) versus scale models, hand-drawn death rays, etc. I do have to agree with the acting though. Very overdone, but again, very 1950's. Overall, I liked this movie when I saw it as a kid in the 70's, and it is now part of my dvd collection. Klatuu Nikto Verada! (From another great 50's sci-fi movie)

Yes   |   No


Marie A.

It's obvious that the low rating above is from a young mind that didn't grow up through early TV and movies. This flick is simple classic Sci-Fi for the time. Scared the bejesus outta me when I first saw it at age 6 (1965). Crude acting? So what. Acting back then wasn't that great on a whole. Kirk and crew of the first Star Trek being the exception. You don't get any better than STrek TOS .... sorry. Anyhow, if you're older, haven't seen this yet, or just haven't seen it in a long while .... grab it. Todays kid need not bother. They are too spoiled with the special effects available now to really enjoy this one

Yes   |   No


Warren S.

CGI filled movies are sweeping the film industry. The new film version is terrific, but this one needs no MAKE NO apologies. This film is about story telling, an art form that is slowly disappearing. This film in the 50's could be compared to “The Matrix films of today kiddy market. This film was not released as one reviewer stated to confuse you LOL, but rather to give you a point of reference. When H.G. Wells delivered his radio account of invading aliens people literally fled there homes. And when this version was released three times as many people came out to see it then Spielberg version...Everyone has memories of a parent telling you of stories late at night about things that bumped in the night...now that was fright. A good question to ask yourself after seeing this version...is the lack of story telling hurting the film industry?

Yes   |   No


George G.

I grew up remembering this on TV in black and white. It was a great concept for its' time. A true classic that alot of us grew up on.

Yes   |   No


Terry B.

This was great when I was young. Back then, the special effects were as good as they got. Story is cool. Tom Cruise remake is awesome.

Yes   |   No


Kerri S.

If you are into this sorta thing then I am sure you will like it. Horrible acting even for that time.

Yes   |   No


Jennifer M.

This is the worse movie I've ever seen. Turned it off about 10 mintues into it. Poor acting, bad effects, stupid plot. Scenes jump around so much that nothing really makes sense. A must NOT to rent.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Dana V.

    This is the movie that terrified me as a child and had me shivering under the covers in the night with imagined aliens outside...much easier to watch as an adult.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Jan P.

    I love this movie and I love the Day the Earth Stood Still. This isn't like the new movie, this is better!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Timothy V.

    This is it folks, the classic War of the Worlds movie! Negative reviews of this movie were most likely written by those whose concept of movie history extends back to what they watched yesterday. The special effects in this movie may look cheesy by today's standards, but they were cutting edge in 1953. I will watch this movie again and again.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 28 Reviews