Vertigo (1958) Reviews

Vertigo (1958)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Dismissed when first released, later heralded as one of director Alfred Hitchcock's finest films (and, according to Hitchcock, his most personal one), this adaptation of the French novel D'entre les morts weaves an intricate web of obsession and deceit. It opens as Scottie Ferguson (James Stewart) realizes he has vertigo, a condition resulting in a fear of heights, when a police officer is killed trying to rescue him from falling off a building. Scottie then retires from his position as a private investigator, only to be lured into another case by his old college friend, Gavin Elster (Tom Helmore). Elster's wife, Madeleine (Kim Novak), has been possessed by a spirit, and Elster wants Scottie to follow her. He hesitantly agrees, and thus begins the film's wordless montage as Scottie follows the beautiful yet enigmatic Madeleine through 1950s San Francisco (accompanied by Bernard Herrmann's hypnotic score). After saving her from suicide, Scottie begins to fall in love with her, and she appears to feel the same way. Here tragedy strikes, and each twist in the movie's second half changes our preconceptions about the characters and events. In 1996 a new print of Vertigo was released, restoring the original grandeur of the colors and the San Francisco backdrop, as well as digitally enhancing the soundtrack. ~ Dylan Wilcox, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
James StewartKim Novak, (more)
Director(s):
Alfred Hitchcock
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
PG
Format(s):
DVD  | Digital SD & HD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(48 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Jeremy D.

I don't feel I should be commenting on this movie since I have seen it only once. It seems only through numberous viewings could one truly appreciate this masterpiece. I will say this movie left me stunned. Hitch is the master at audience manipulation. He lures you into the film and focuses your attention on exactly what he wants you to see. The ending of this movie is amazing. Jimmy Stewart is very effective in the lead. His angst was palpable. This is definitely one of the greatest movies I have ever seen

Yes   |   No


Miguel C.

This film was better than I expected. I never knew Stewart could play this sort of character. The story threw me for a loop. It was unexpected and appreciated. I also appreciated the psychological aspect of the characters and what they were going through. I didn't know films from that era were like this. On the technical side, I know most outdoor scenes were filmed on stage with projections. But the melding of the two was flawless. And set construction was unbelievable, especially when done for scenes that lasted only a few minutes. This was my first Hitchcock film, more to come.

Yes   |   No


Mark W.

A very unsuspenseful movie from the "Master of Suspense". Plodding and boring. What Hitchcock ever saw in James Stewart is beyond me, because I still think he one of the most overrated actors in film history. Sorry, but the truth hurts. Try North by Northwest or Strangers on a Train instead.

Yes   |   No


Tony W.

After visiting San Juan Batista, I learned that this movie was filmed there, I wanted to see it for that reason alone. This is a restored version that brings the movie back to life. James Stewart is awesome and Kim Novak is a beautiful goddess. There is a "Making of" the restored version documentary. And a commentary track from the two guys that restored the film and some of the original film producers. All in all I was glad that I ordered it , and it is well worth the time.

Yes   |   No


Patty B.

overall a well-done thriller . Tight plotting an fun concept great characters terffic acting escepially by jimmy stewart brilliant camera work and a haunting ending. it's a bit complicated but worth sitting through, it never gets boring or dull has some great twists and the scenery is terrific really likes san franciso. on a final note i just viewed the restored verison of vertigo and it looks really good . 9/10 excellent suspense supernatural thriller great rental.

Yes   |   No


Bryan B.

Not as good as I had expected. There is a great building of tension throughout the movie, but overall it was a bit slow. In case you're like me and haven't seen it, I won't give it away, but the end makes it all worth it. Be warned, this one is pretty slow.

Yes   |   No


Brittney F.

Classic Hitchcock & Stewart combo, one of the most famous and beloved - and for good reason. A MUST SEE for yourself!

Yes   |   No


Rondell C.

wow, this film sets a new standard for films. The twists in the plot that keep you guessing, the visual effects that are dated but at the same time poetic and artistic to this day, and the ending... what an ending... wow.

Yes   |   No


Ann C.

Fantastic film. It's right at the top of my all-time favorite list. Not only do I own it, but I give it all the credit for starting my lifelong love affair with San Francisco!

Yes   |   No


Kim M.

I am normally quite a Hitchcock fan, but this movie left me a little disappointed. It is the first time I've seen it from beginning to end, and I was mostly bored.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $14.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 3 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Jeremy D.

    I don't feel I should be commenting on this movie since I have seen it only once. It seems only through numberous viewings could one truly appreciate this masterpiece. I will say this movie left me stunned. Hitch is the master at audience manipulation. He lures you into the film and focuses your attention on exactly what he wants you to see. The ending of this movie is amazing. Jimmy Stewart is very effective in the lead. His angst was palpable. This is definitely one of the greatest movies I have ever seen

    Yes   |   No

     
    Miguel C.

    This film was better than I expected. I never knew Stewart could play this sort of character. The story threw me for a loop. It was unexpected and appreciated. I also appreciated the psychological aspect of the characters and what they were going through. I didn't know films from that era were like this. On the technical side, I know most outdoor scenes were filmed on stage with projections. But the melding of the two was flawless. And set construction was unbelievable, especially when done for scenes that lasted only a few minutes. This was my first Hitchcock film, more to come.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Mark W.

    A very unsuspenseful movie from the "Master of Suspense". Plodding and boring. What Hitchcock ever saw in James Stewart is beyond me, because I still think he one of the most overrated actors in film history. Sorry, but the truth hurts. Try North by Northwest or Strangers on a Train instead.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 48 Reviews