Time After Time (1979) Reviews

Time After Time (1979)
Member Rating:  
It's H.G. Wells (Malcolm McDowell) versus Jack the Ripper (David Warner) in the fanciful Time After Time -- and, per the film's title, the chase extends from the 19th century to the 20th. Wells has built a time machine in his cellar, which the Ripper uses as a means of escape. Both men find themselves in 20th century San Francisco, and, after a period of adjustment, they make themselves at home. The plot takes a dark turn when the Ripper, disappointed that Wells' dreams of a Utopian future have not come to fruition, resumes his murderous activities. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Malcolm McDowellDavid Warner, (more)
Director(s):
Nicholas Meyer
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
PG
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(11 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Glenn B.

While one could scoff at the fact that a movie that stemmed from the very tail-end of the 70's could not possibly have the special effects that a movie in this day and age boasts, I will honor it for what it truly appeared to be: A a unique and well-made time-travel movie. True, some of the time-travel scenes themselves are a bit outdated, but it does nothing to detract from the overall movie. McDowell is convincing as the brilliant inventor Wells, the man who made the time machine. Warner is good as the Ripper himself, though I suppose a character like his could afford a bit more insanity and intensity. Although, the very plot should attract you from the start. Steenburgen adds to the story as the teller in the future (1979 future) that Wells falls in love with. It really has all the classic elements of good movies: science-fiction, murder, suspense, and that persistent love. I couldn't think of an excuse not to watch this movie.

Yes   |   No


Robert M.

The real strength of this movie is that it is good on multiple levels. The director & writer Nicolas Meyer did a great job crafting this classy thriller. A testament to that is that it holds up well after 32 years. The central idea of Jack the Ripper being chased through time to the present by H.G. Wells is very interesting and made believable in this telling. David Warner as the Ripper is particularly excellent and Malcolm McDowell and Mary Steenbergen make their on screen romance come to life. Finally, the music score adds a fantasy element moves the story along with great momentum to its inevitable climax.

Yes   |   No


John M.

Actually,this movie was pretty good,still better than the garbage their putting in theaters today.

Yes   |   No


Christine T.

I seen many time travel movies but there is something unique about this one. Most likely chasing a well known criminal from his own time period into the future where he continues his killing spree. I like the effects they used to show the time machine as it went from one time period to another. Shame this movie was so underrated!

Yes   |   No


Eric H.

Review 324: H.G. Wells' time machine at a more thrilling pace as McDowell plays slightly a great hero lost in his creation and this crazy mess around him.

Yes   |   No


John W.

Very dated but a nice twist on the Time Machine story. Well acted by a good cast.

Yes   |   No


David D.

It Sucks.

Yes   |   No


Charles B.

I enjoyed it very interesting story. Low key effects but a good plot

Yes   |   No


Scott S.

The story is very much like the older HG Wells movie, The Time Machine, but cheesier. The plot is fun and has some interesting details concerning time travel even though it's hardly accurate and often misses the whole "paradox" issue when dealing with time travel. What I do like about this film is how it captures the late 70's in a very realistic way. With so many 70's recreations on film and tv these days it's rather refreshing to see an actual snapshot of the lives and times of the 70's as they really were.

Yes   |   No


Jeff J.

The story had some gaps that detracted from a nice plot.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $9.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Glenn B.

    While one could scoff at the fact that a movie that stemmed from the very tail-end of the 70's could not possibly have the special effects that a movie in this day and age boasts, I will honor it for what it truly appeared to be: A a unique and well-made time-travel movie. True, some of the time-travel scenes themselves are a bit outdated, but it does nothing to detract from the overall movie. McDowell is convincing as the brilliant inventor Wells, the man who made the time machine. Warner is good as the Ripper himself, though I suppose a character like his could afford a bit more insanity and intensity. Although, the very plot should attract you from the start. Steenburgen adds to the story as the teller in the future (1979 future) that Wells falls in love with. It really has all the classic elements of good movies: science-fiction, murder, suspense, and that persistent love. I couldn't think of an excuse not to watch this movie.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Robert M.

    The real strength of this movie is that it is good on multiple levels. The director & writer Nicolas Meyer did a great job crafting this classy thriller. A testament to that is that it holds up well after 32 years. The central idea of Jack the Ripper being chased through time to the present by H.G. Wells is very interesting and made believable in this telling. David Warner as the Ripper is particularly excellent and Malcolm McDowell and Mary Steenbergen make their on screen romance come to life. Finally, the music score adds a fantasy element moves the story along with great momentum to its inevitable climax.

    Yes   |   No

     
    John M.

    Actually,this movie was pretty good,still better than the garbage their putting in theaters today.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 11 Reviews