This Sporting Life (1963) Reviews

This Sporting Life (1963)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Adapted by David Storey from his own novel, This Sporting Life stars Richard Harris as Frank, an athletic coal miner who aspires to the greener pastures of professional rugby. Soon establishing himself as one of the most brutal and arrogant players in the business, Frank begins to amass a fortune. He also falls in love with his landlady, Mrs. Hammond (Rachel Roberts), who initially resists his advances. When she finally gives in, their relationship hinges on sex alone, as Frank practically begs Mrs. Hammond to give of herself emotionally and she remains incapable. At the wedding ceremony for one of Frank's teammates, Mrs. Hammond unexpectedly lashes out at her swaggering lover. They split up, but Frank, who until now has equated happiness with wealth, is unable to get over the permanent loss. In the end, with nothing else left, all of Frank's self-worth becomes contingent on his rugby performances, though Frank and the other players are exploited to such a degree that this also proves disastrous. Widely regarded as one of the finest British feature films ever produced, the gritty and bleak This Sporting Life not only marked former documentary filmmaker Lindsay Anderson's first feature, but became one of the harbingers of the "Angry Young Man" school of filmmaking. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Richard HarrisRachel Roberts, (more)
Director(s):
Lindsay Anderson
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(10 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Eric M.

This is a tremendous and powerful movie. It is not for the faint-hearted. Full of grit, sweat and raw emotion, the acting and black and white cinematography are superb. Highly recommended!

Yes   |   No


Franklyn B.

Saw this film in 1967 in a film seminar. Still like it. Has an interesting story line with lots of subplots and I thought well acted. I recommend it to anyone with an interest in a well constructed film...lots of character tension, social norms played out...excellent film from that era's developement using location filming and not on a film lot settings.

Yes   |   No


Miriam H.

I thought I needed to see this movie to complete my Lindsay Anderson education but wasn't really looking forward to it. I was very pleasantly surprised that it was by no means a sports movie, a man's movie. There is a lot happening on many levels. It is emotionally wrenching without being maudlin. Loved it.

Yes   |   No


DENNIS P.

I hate to stray from the crowd here. Perhaps I was distracted while I was watching (always having to watch my dogs). Or maybe I'm just a product of my times. But somewhere along the line, I missed the point of this movie.

Yes   |   No


Keith G.

Strong moments of acting, photography, and interesting use of fractured time mark the first feature by Lindsay Anderson. A key film of the British New Wave cinema that moved English film towards gritty realism. (Ironic, considering Anderson's greatest films If.... and O Lucky Man are quite far from that kind of naturalism. Almost all critics consider it a masterpiece, but on first viewing the performances and the writing were too theatrical for me to grant it that level of perfection. It also felt repetitive in spots. A lower-class young man (Richard Harris) makes his mark as a particularly violent, tough rugby player, while trying, in his awkward, coarse way to seduce his landlady (Rachel Roberts). I plan to re-see this. As often with films one has heard about for years, I may have been over hyped, and missed something deeper. But even as is, I found it a strong, impressive and very worthwhile first feature.

Yes   |   No


Megan E.

While the acting is amazing, the film plods a long at a slow pace with random flashbacks. Worth watching for film buffs

Yes   |   No


Becky W.

This was the most depressing film I ever saw. also, too long, and very boring.

Yes   |   No


Joan Q.

This is probably the worst movie I've ever seen.

Yes   |   No


Wayne H.

What did I just experience ????? No story, just a lot of screwball scenes about the Irish Liberation is all I could surmise !!!

Yes   |   No


Robert B.

the disc was cracked...thus, no review

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $30.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Eric M.

    This is a tremendous and powerful movie. It is not for the faint-hearted. Full of grit, sweat and raw emotion, the acting and black and white cinematography are superb. Highly recommended!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Franklyn B.

    Saw this film in 1967 in a film seminar. Still like it. Has an interesting story line with lots of subplots and I thought well acted. I recommend it to anyone with an interest in a well constructed film...lots of character tension, social norms played out...excellent film from that era's developement using location filming and not on a film lot settings.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Miriam H.

    I thought I needed to see this movie to complete my Lindsay Anderson education but wasn't really looking forward to it. I was very pleasantly surprised that it was by no means a sports movie, a man's movie. There is a lot happening on many levels. It is emotionally wrenching without being maudlin. Loved it.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 10 Reviews