Sympathy for the Devil (1968) Reviews

Sympathy for the Devil (1968)
Member Rating:  
Jean-Luc Godard's Sympathy for the Devil, also known as One Plus One, uses both documentary and staged sequences, alternating between an inside look at a rock band's recording process and reflections on contemporary politics and aesthetics. One half of the film focuses on the Rolling Stones, as they rehearse and ultimately record the song that would become "Sympathy for the Devil." By presenting repeated takes of the entire composition, the film allows the viewer to witness the progressive evolution of the song from its original, slower conception to the more percussive version that became the final recording. The other half of the film -- which is occasionally accompanied by the song -- presents a series of sequences dealing with issues like black power, pornography, racism, and Marxism, amongst others. These sequences, which often focus on a group of revolutionary youth in Paris, provide a chance for Godard to inject political commentary and meta-fictional musings on the nature of cinema. These more cerebral scenes serve as counterpoint to the direct presentation of the creative process seen in the Stones' studio sessions, and provide oblique commentary on the political meanings of popular music. ~ Judd Blaise, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
The Rolling StonesIain Quarrier, (more)
Director(s):
Jean-Luc Godard
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(11 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Wayne L.

The photography of the studio sequences is very gritty and raw which makes the viewer feel as if they're there with the Stones during the creation of one of their most classic songs. The film is a great artifact of how the recording process took place at the time. I could have done without some of the more "Godardish" scenes between the studio stuff. Sometimes less is more.

Yes   |   No


Guy L.

This is an interesting ~30 minute documentary about the creative recording process used by the late '60s era Stones which is interlaced with an hour of over the top '60s "avant garde" filmmaking which is mired in the politics of the time. It is wild to see Keith switch amps for sound, see Brian trying to learn a song, see Wyman stuck playing percussion while Keith plays bass, and Jagger wrestle with lyrics. I'd much rather watch that than the "oooh look we said dirty things and smeared girls with ketchup and wander through the woods" nonsense that is interesting only if you are a self absorbed undergraduate filmmaker. Brian Jones strums away at a guitar no one can hear and the engineer tells Keith to turn down. Great stuff!

Yes   |   No


Allie L.

I love The Rolling Stones, but I wouldn't really recommend this. Their footage was pretty interesting but there wasn't nearly enough of it, and the ridiculous voiceover was annoying and distracting. The rest of the film was absolutely worthless and I wound up speeding through it to reach more Stones footage.

Yes   |   No


David P.

I watched because I am interested in seeing Godard's films. I think the Stones are an overrated band. The movie shows details of the production of Sympathy for the Devil. A stupid song narrated by a liar called Lucifer. The Stones studio scenes are mixed with scenes of a radical Black Power group and another group of 60's hipsters spouting hippie talk. My guess is Godard was high on drugs when he made this film.

Yes   |   No


Donald K.

Awful. A studio session posing as an avant garde movie. Except for the early scenes of the Rolling Stones a waste of time.

Yes   |   No


William T.

Brian Jones was a reminder of the core early Rolling Stones. I almost forgot how important he was!

Yes   |   No


Julie V.

the political narratives interspliced with footage of the Stones recording Sympathy For the Devil is such a stretch, that i wish they were released separately from each other. for anyone interested in the recording process, or if you're a Stones fan, it's worth seeing for the studio footage alone. i can appreciate the political/artistic junk to an extent, but i get tired of the drivel very quickly, just like i would tire of Chinese water torture.

Yes   |   No


Kent F.

Half of this film is the Stones in the studio recording Sympathy for the Devil and that is VERY interesting (note how Brian Jones is hardly a part of the band at this stage and his acoustic guitar is not on the final mix). The other half is composed of weird Jean-Luc Godard garbage. Yes, Godard fans, GARBAGE. So, all you Rolling Stones fans, by all means rent it, but have your remote in hand with finger on the FF button.

Yes   |   No


Rob S.

this started off ok with behind the scenes studio footage, but it kept bouncing back and forth from a terrible movie. I couldn't get through more than a few minutes of it...

Yes   |   No


PATRICIA S.

I am rating the movie a three star.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $16.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Wayne L.

    The photography of the studio sequences is very gritty and raw which makes the viewer feel as if they're there with the Stones during the creation of one of their most classic songs. The film is a great artifact of how the recording process took place at the time. I could have done without some of the more "Godardish" scenes between the studio stuff. Sometimes less is more.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Guy L.

    This is an interesting ~30 minute documentary about the creative recording process used by the late '60s era Stones which is interlaced with an hour of over the top '60s "avant garde" filmmaking which is mired in the politics of the time. It is wild to see Keith switch amps for sound, see Brian trying to learn a song, see Wyman stuck playing percussion while Keith plays bass, and Jagger wrestle with lyrics. I'd much rather watch that than the "oooh look we said dirty things and smeared girls with ketchup and wander through the woods" nonsense that is interesting only if you are a self absorbed undergraduate filmmaker. Brian Jones strums away at a guitar no one can hear and the engineer tells Keith to turn down. Great stuff!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Allie L.

    I love The Rolling Stones, but I wouldn't really recommend this. Their footage was pretty interesting but there wasn't nearly enough of it, and the ridiculous voiceover was annoying and distracting. The rest of the film was absolutely worthless and I wound up speeding through it to reach more Stones footage.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 11 Reviews