Slaughterhouse-Five (1972) Reviews

Slaughterhouse-Five (1972)
Member Rating:  
"Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time." These opening words of Kurt Vonnegut's famous novel make an effective and short summary of a haunting, funny film. For the screen, director George Roy Hill faithfully renders Vonnegut's black anti-war comedy about Pilgrim (well played in a low key by Michael Sacks), who survives the horrendous 1945 fire bombing of Dresden then lives simultaneously in his past as a naïve American POW and in the future as a well-cared-for zoo resident on the planet Tralfamadore (with zaftig Valerie Perrine as his mate). In the present, he's a middle-aged optometrist in Ilium, NY. If this sounds like a bit of a jumble -- it is. But viewers willing to watch carefully will find the movie as intricate and harmonious as Glenn Gould's plaintive renderings of the Bach keyboard pieces that decorate its soundtrack. It's not essential, but fans who read the short, poetic book will find it a treat in itself, and it will help them appreciate Hill's genius in bringing this "Children's Crusade" to the screen. In addition to Sacks, there are noteworthy performances by Ron Leibman (Norma's union man in Norma Rae) as Pilgrim's crazed nemesis and by radio/TV/movie legend, John Dehner as the arrogant Professor Rumfoord. Hill, of course, came to this film from a big hit, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and went on to triumph with The Sting one year later. The elaborate medieval and baroque architecture of pre-bombing Dresden was represented authentically in the film by scenes from Prague, since much of Dresden's architecture was lost to the bombing, and that city, in any case, was deep in East Germany, thus inaccessible at the time of filming. ~ Michael P. Rogers, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Michael SacksRon Leibman, (more)
Director(s):
George Roy Hill
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  | Digital SD & HD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(10 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Milford G.

I saw this when it first came out and find it even more entertaining NOW then I did way back when. The characters are portrayed in a fashion that allows the maximum focus on the main character and the general idea. The sci fi bits are really kind of twighlight zone- like and thats a plus, the general ideas presented on WW2 and the issue of civilian casualty both serve as an exellent tool to move the story along. The dialog is thought provoking and sometimes disturbing, I imagine a general feeling of guilt means we have a conscience or something. I find the film to be one of the major works from the seventies, the lighting, directing,acting and script all reflect accurately both the writer's intent as well as the context of protests the late 60's and early seventies held for some of us. The line between fiction and fantasy is crossed and recrossed in this film! I enjoy it and if you have an open mind, so will you.

Yes   |   No


Christopher C.

I am a HUGE fan of Kurt Vonnegut and didn't know this movie even existed until just recently. I was very pleased with it! Michael Sacks plays "Billy Pilgrim" to a tee. If you are a fan of the novel, this is a MUST watch.

Yes   |   No


Michael H.

Just an excellent movie. I have watched several times, over the years, and always enjoyed it.

Yes   |   No


Greg S.

Elements of the story and how they tie together are somewhat obscure. It is centered around the WWII destruction of Dresden and the scenes of Dresden prior to the fire bombing are wistful; it was a beautiful and cultural city and the film does a good job of conveying it. The finale seems trite; difficult to understand.

Yes   |   No


Eric H.

Review 182: based on a cult novel, the author uses Sci-fi to expand on his real life WWII experiences while correlating other parts of the story out of sequence which makes it all hard to relate to or care for at all.

Yes   |   No


Mark H.

This is a very solid rendering of the novel. Ron Leibman really chews up every scene he appears in as Paul Lazzaro (with two Zs!). Sacks nails the subdued, bewildered Pilgrim. I recently re-read the novel and only stumbled upon the movie. It's aged well. A worth-while effort!

Yes   |   No


Dennis G.

not bad for 1972 / these days its just okay worth the watch for the story line and the special effects

Yes   |   No


Jeannette H.

I first saw this as a teenager, and for some reason remembered it being much, much better. Now, some [mumblemumble] years later, having watched it again...I can't for the life of me remember what was good about it. The characters are 2D stock; acting is mediocre; overall quality sub-standard even for 1972. Recommended as a sedative only. Read the book.

Yes   |   No


Patricia L.

weird time travel events -- movie is a dud compared to the book - do you know billy's sister?

Yes   |   No


Joe A.

The so-called classic book this movie was based on stunk and this film stinks also.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 3 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Milford G.

    I saw this when it first came out and find it even more entertaining NOW then I did way back when. The characters are portrayed in a fashion that allows the maximum focus on the main character and the general idea. The sci fi bits are really kind of twighlight zone- like and thats a plus, the general ideas presented on WW2 and the issue of civilian casualty both serve as an exellent tool to move the story along. The dialog is thought provoking and sometimes disturbing, I imagine a general feeling of guilt means we have a conscience or something. I find the film to be one of the major works from the seventies, the lighting, directing,acting and script all reflect accurately both the writer's intent as well as the context of protests the late 60's and early seventies held for some of us. The line between fiction and fantasy is crossed and recrossed in this film! I enjoy it and if you have an open mind, so will you.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Christopher C.

    I am a HUGE fan of Kurt Vonnegut and didn't know this movie even existed until just recently. I was very pleased with it! Michael Sacks plays "Billy Pilgrim" to a tee. If you are a fan of the novel, this is a MUST watch.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Michael H.

    Just an excellent movie. I have watched several times, over the years, and always enjoyed it.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 10 Reviews