DCSIMG
 
 

The Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007) Reviews

The Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
A naïve group of National Guard trainees embark on a routine training mission in the New Mexico desert, only to find themselves face to face with a murderous band of cannibalistic mutants in prolific music video director Martin Weisz's sequel to the successful 2006 remake. An isolated desert research camp has been mysteriously abandoned, and now it's up to an elite unit of soldiers to uncover the truth about the scientists who vanished without a trace. Their attention soon diverted by a distress signal emitting from a distant mountain range, the squadron quickly regroups and sets out to investigate. Unbeknownst to the soldiers, however, is the fact that these are the very same hills where the Carter family recently fell prey to a flesh-eating pack of hideously deformed mutants. As the ranks of the cavalry unit steadily begin to dwindle, it soon becomes obvious that their guns provide little defense from an evil driven by hunger to commit the ultimate crime against humanity. Original Hills Have Eyes and Hills Have Eyes, Part 2 writer/director Wes Craven teams with son Jonathan to script this grim and unforgiving tale of man versus mutant. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Michael McMillianJessica Stroup, (more)
Director(s):
Martin Weisz
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(205 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Gregg O.

Obviously the director didn't know anything about the US military. The only thing that remotely resembled something of truth with the National Guard was some of the uniform items. The movie showed serious breakdowns in military discipline that just do not occur. I'm in the military and have been in many combat and other difficult situations; we're too well trained to fall apart like the movie portrays. The scenes where the Colonel is the security is not reality. The Iraq training the movie portrays is ridiculous. And once again this kind of movie seriously degrades women and is just stupid. Not worth money being spent on.

Yes   |   No


Sarah S.

The military made this film dull. It was okay but i wanted them all to die.

Yes   |   No


Cheryl R.

I actually liked this one better than the first. More people are slaughtered and it's much more gory. Does it have a great storyline, build relationships, develop characters ... NO! But we don't typically look for that in horror films and this does have what we expect from horror ... blood, guts, lost limbs, screams, rape, fear ... HORROR.

Yes   |   No


Robert W.

Truly the worst movie I've ever seen. So many better options. Trust me keep clicking! :)

Yes   |   No


Jeff H.

Avoid this bad remake.

Yes   |   No


Laura S.

I love a good scary movie. This was not one of the good ones. The only thing different with this sequel from it's predecessor is the group of people getting killed. Same situations, same rape scenes, same outcome, same bad acting, blah blah blah. Wasn't scary, just stupid.

Yes   |   No


Kerri M.

This was the most awful movie ever. Really. The first was bad but this made that look like a carnival ride.

Yes   |   No


Robert L.

This is a very poor movie. Standard horror flick with no acting, no plot, and just a very poor film. Not reccomeded.

Yes   |   No


SALLY B.

I absolutely LOVED the first one. This one's horrible. A bunch of army guys wandering around the rocks and desert is blah to me. Where's all the suspense and crazy lookin' people like the last movie? Hated it.

Yes   |   No


John S.

f*cking boring and f*cking ugly

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
BuyPreviously Viewed   $2.39
(disc only) 

New  from  $10.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Gregg O.

    Obviously the director didn't know anything about the US military. The only thing that remotely resembled something of truth with the National Guard was some of the uniform items. The movie showed serious breakdowns in military discipline that just do not occur. I'm in the military and have been in many combat and other difficult situations; we're too well trained to fall apart like the movie portrays. The scenes where the Colonel is the security is not reality. The Iraq training the movie portrays is ridiculous. And once again this kind of movie seriously degrades women and is just stupid. Not worth money being spent on.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Sarah S.

    The military made this film dull. It was okay but i wanted them all to die.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Cheryl R.

    I actually liked this one better than the first. More people are slaughtered and it's much more gory. Does it have a great storyline, build relationships, develop characters ... NO! But we don't typically look for that in horror films and this does have what we expect from horror ... blood, guts, lost limbs, screams, rape, fear ... HORROR.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 205 Reviews