Rachel, Rachel (1968) Reviews

Rachel, Rachel (1968)
Member Rating:  
Paul Newman made his directorial debut and Newman's wife, Joanne Woodward, stars as Rachel Cameron, a 35-year-old unmarried schoolteacher who feels as though she's wasted her life. Rachel's best friend, Calla Mackie (Estelle Parsons), invites her to attend a religious revival meeting. Here Rachel is swept up in the emotional fervor orchestrated by a young guest preacher (Terry Kiser). This is the first of several cathartic incidents which convince Rachel to kick over the traces and express her own needs and emotions. She has a brief sexual liaison with an old family friend (James Olson), and is delighted at the notion that she might have become pregnant. Rachel ends up alone and childless (her "pregnancy" was nothing more than a benign cyst), but still determined to forge a new life for herself. Based the novel A Jest of God by Margaret Laurence, Rachel, Rachel won New York Film Critics awards for both Joanne Woodward and Paul Newman, and an Oscar nomination for Joanne Woodward. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Joanne WoodwardJames Olson, (more)
Director(s):
Paul Newman
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(5 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


William C.

Joanne Woodward is great, as is Estelle Parsons. This is one of the first movies to reflect the views of nascent women's lib movent which began in the late 1960's. It holds up well even after all these years.

Yes   |   No


Ann C.

It has been a long time since I first saw this movie, and I always wanted to watch it again. Was it as good as I remembered it? Yes. There's a bit of "Six Feet Under" in the story, as grade school teacher Rachel and her smothering mother live upstairs in a funeral home. As for the photo in Nick's wallet, it may have been his child--showing that Nick would make no lasting commitment to Rachel.

Yes   |   No


Diane A.

It was "before its time".

Yes   |   No


Lawrence C D.

Do not waste your time watching with this so called movie, every seen has a flashback in it, this is a very bad movie, it's dreary and very slow-moving thru out the whole movie.

Yes   |   No


Cary B.

The premise of the film has a high potential of interest, but largely disappoints in its execution. (Also, can someone please tell me the significance of the picture in the wallet that the boyfriend shows Rachel while saying, "I'm not God.)?

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    William C.

    Joanne Woodward is great, as is Estelle Parsons. This is one of the first movies to reflect the views of nascent women's lib movent which began in the late 1960's. It holds up well even after all these years.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Ann C.

    It has been a long time since I first saw this movie, and I always wanted to watch it again. Was it as good as I remembered it? Yes. There's a bit of "Six Feet Under" in the story, as grade school teacher Rachel and her smothering mother live upstairs in a funeral home. As for the photo in Nick's wallet, it may have been his child--showing that Nick would make no lasting commitment to Rachel.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Diane A.

    It was "before its time".

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 5 Reviews