DCSIMG
 
 

Codebreakers (2005) Reviews

Codebreakers (2005)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Produced for cable's ESPN network, Codebreakers dramatizes a real-life cheating scandal that rocked the foundations of West Point in 1951. Cadet Brian Nolan (Zachery Ty Bryan) is the roommate of varsity football players George Holbrook (Jeff Roop) and Bob Blaik (Corey Sevier), the latter being the son of West Point's colorful football coach Earl "Red" Blaik (Scott Glenn) -- the man who, according to legend, coined the phrase "winning isn't everything, it's the only thing" (significantly, Blaik's assistant coach was Vince Lombardi). Through casual conversation, young Nolan discovers to his horror that several of Blaik's players have taken the coach's philosophy literally, to the extent of cheating on exams to keep up their required GPAs. Their assumption -- not borne out by fact, as it turns out -- is that the coach will never find out, and if he does, he won't care. The ensuing scandal plays right into the hands of West Point's hard-nosed Commandant Paul D Harkins (Jude Ciccolelle), who, long resentful of the prominence of football at the academy, has eagerly awaited the opportunity to topple Coach Blaik from his throne. Ultimately, 83 cadets, including Bob Blaik, are implicated in the scandal -- and the penalty for breaking the Point's sacred Honor Code is a terrible one indeed. The most intriguing aspect of the film is the portrayal of whistleblower Brian Nolan, who though he has technically done the Right Thing is not a particularly likable person; indeed, certain viewers may well be swayed to the side of the disgraced football players as they make Nolan's life Hell on earth for telling what he knows. Filmed in Toronto, Codebreakers was first telecast on December 9, 2005. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Scott GlennZachery Ty Bryan, (more)
Director(s):
Rod Holcomb
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(7 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Brian R.

In fairness tothis movie I should tell you that I did not finish watching it. I just couldn't get into it. I think I got a mental block when I realized it was an ESPN original and not a Hollywood production, so I assumed it would lack tinsel-town's refinement. Still, wading past that, I guess I simply wasn't "in the mood". Maybe it is a good movie, but it failed to entertain me soon enough and so there you go.

Yes   |   No


William T.

It was a little too slow for our taste, but a good story none the less. We wouldn't watch it a second time, but glad we saw it once. If you have nothing better to do, then this is the movie for you.

Yes   |   No


Barb S.

Good movie; moved at fast pace. Just glad to see people get punished for doing the wrong thing, even if they thought it was for the right reason. Such as cheating in order to be able to play a sport.

Yes   |   No


Joanne P.

I found this movie woth watching. There was good acting by Scott Glenn and the rest of the cast. This was based on a true story which made it more interesting.

Yes   |   No


John F.

First, this was the second weak movie about sports at a military academy I watched this month (after Annapolis). Second, it is not really a football movie, although it revolves around a football team and its coach. It's about honor, duty and loyalty (especially of the misplaced kind). Unfortunately, the themes are woefully underexplored, but perhaps that was in the nature of the actual events portrayed. If so, then it wasn't really the best choice for a dramatization. The football scenes looked way too modern in style, I thought, although everything else looked pretty much in period. The acting generally was weak, and even Scott Glenn looked uncomfortable in his role as coach Red Blaik. The actor playing Vince Lombardi was a dead ringer, though. The movie also had an odd grainy quality to it much of the time. It wasn't consistently so and I suspect this was a bad DVD transfer. If you want a good movie about cheating in sports, then watch Eight Men Out.

Yes   |   No


Theresa L.

My husband and I enjoyed this movie. It definitely made you think. What would you do if you were in the same situation and faced with a moral decision? I am sure this type of thing (cheating) happens more than we know. It's a movie worth renting.

Yes   |   No


Jerome W.

It is entertaining. Moves at a good pace and has a good story to tell. Worth a rent.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Brian R.

    In fairness tothis movie I should tell you that I did not finish watching it. I just couldn't get into it. I think I got a mental block when I realized it was an ESPN original and not a Hollywood production, so I assumed it would lack tinsel-town's refinement. Still, wading past that, I guess I simply wasn't "in the mood". Maybe it is a good movie, but it failed to entertain me soon enough and so there you go.

    Yes   |   No

     
    William T.

    It was a little too slow for our taste, but a good story none the less. We wouldn't watch it a second time, but glad we saw it once. If you have nothing better to do, then this is the movie for you.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Barb S.

    Good movie; moved at fast pace. Just glad to see people get punished for doing the wrong thing, even if they thought it was for the right reason. Such as cheating in order to be able to play a sport.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 7 Reviews