The Paradine Case (1947) Reviews

The Paradine Case (1947)
Member Rating:  
Based on a novel by Robert Hichens, The Paradine Case concerns Anna Paradine (Alida Valli), on trial for the murder of her wealthy husband. British barrister Anthony Keane (played by the aggressively American Gregory Peck) takes on the case-and in the process, falls in love with Anna, despite being married himself. Despite his client's protests, Keane summons Anna's lover, unkempt stableman Andre Latour (Louis Jourdan), hoping to prove in court that Latour was the killer. Only after a series of stunning upsets does Keane realize that, for the first time in his career, he has allowed his heart to rule his head. In a typically perverse Hitchcockian development, the film's most unpleasant character, an autocratic, vindictive judge played by Charles Laughton, is one of the few who can see through Anna's facade. Hitchcock had wanted Greta Garbo to play Anna Paradine, and indeed a screen test was filmed, but Garbo ultimately declined. At the time of filming, Hitchcock was enamored with uninterrupted, 10-minute takes (later used to the extreme in Rope); thus, the Old Bailey courtroom set where much of the action takes place was designed to accommodate multiple cameras and elaborately conceived crane movements. Such techniques were cumbersome in 1947, and as a result the over-illuminated set ended up costing $70,000, jacking up the film's overall budget to a whopping $3 million (quite a pretty penny in those days). The film was a box-office disappointment, spelling the end of the always-rocky association between Alfred Hitchcock and producer David O. Selznick. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Gregory PeckAnn Todd, (more)
Director(s):
Alfred Hitchcock
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(1 member review)  


Member Reviews


Megan E.

Disappointing film mostly because Hitchcock really isn't in it. David O Selznick took over the picture, including the casting and even re-wrote Hitchcock's script. Acting is alright and the movie can be enjoyable if the viewer takes Hitchcock out of the equation.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

We're sorry, this title is not available to rent or buy by mail.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Megan E.

    Disappointing film mostly because Hitchcock really isn't in it. David O Selznick took over the picture, including the casting and even re-wrote Hitchcock's script. Acting is alright and the movie can be enjoyable if the viewer takes Hitchcock out of the equation.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 1 Reviews