DCSIMG
 
 

One Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern (2005) Reviews

One Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern (2005)
Member Rating:  
In the spring and summer of 1972, George McGovern, a Democratic senator from South Dakota, achieved the seemingly impossible. Backed by a motley collection of Prairie populists, old-school liberals, and young people disenchanted with the war in Vietnam, McGovern overwhelmed longtime party favorites such as Hubert Humphrey and Edmund Muskie to win the Democratic nomination for the presidency of the United States. However, McGovern's triumph proved to be short-lived; after his initial running mate, Thomas Eagleton, was revealed to have a history of mental illness, the McGovern campaign went into a tailspin from which it would never recover, with the incumbent Richard Nixon winning the 1972 election by a landslide. However, McGovern's campaign is still remembered by many as one of the last examples of a candidate truly triumphing through the will of the people rather than working the party political machine, and given the scandalous downfall of Nixon following his re-election, many have wondered what America would be like today if McGovern, once described by Robert F. Kennedy as "the most decent man in the Senate," had won. One Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern is a documentary which looks back at the McGovern campaign and explores what went right, what went wrong, and what was McGovern's true legacy. The film includes interviews with Howard Zinn, Gloria Steinem, Gary Hart, Frank Mankiewicz, Warren Beatty, Gore Vidal, Ron Kovic, and McGovern himself. ~ Mark Deming, Rovi

 Read More


Director(s):
Stephen Vittoria
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 

Movies Similar to One Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern


 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(3 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


John J.

Must see film. From Middle-America, soft spoken and very progressive. George McGovern was obviously just too far ahead of his time to be reckoned with. Barely mentions Watergate that almost destroyed our country. Remembers the liberating Democratic convention and participatory process was opened up for one last time. The US media control, spin doctors & money talks every election after the 1972- show that this was one last noble experiment. Interviews are great- Warren Beatty, Gary Hart, Dick Gregory. The shooting of George Wallace raises MORE QUESTIONS about our government. Thomas Eagleton was not researched before getting the VP nod-- and they blame HUMPHREY for that. This may be a “let's blame everyone else when we stink film”-- but it really sheds a cogent theme that today's Iraq “peaceniks" better keep in mind for the 2008 election. George- we won't forget you-- and remember the bumper sticks- "Don't Blame me, I'm from Massachusetts!!"

Yes   |   No


Bernie W.

I'm not sure what film Ralph G was watching. The New York Times called the film "well-researched," Muskie was not replaced as VP but rather Thomas Eagleton, and the point that the campaign is left to the last 15 minutes of the film is utterly false. And of course the Vietnam War was ranted against - that ongoing rant defined George McGovern's career. It's a cornerstone of the film.

Yes   |   No


Ralph G.

The movie is alleged to be about McGovern’s ‘72 campaign against Nixon. Only the last 15 minutes is. Totally unresearched, they attribute McGovern’s stunning defeat to the fact his convention acceptance speech was broadcast at 2:30 AM and Muskie having to be replaced as his VP. The rest of the movie is a rant against the Viet Nam war, political contemporaries of McGovern, Democratic or Republican, and McGovern’s bio.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    John J.

    Must see film. From Middle-America, soft spoken and very progressive. George McGovern was obviously just too far ahead of his time to be reckoned with. Barely mentions Watergate that almost destroyed our country. Remembers the liberating Democratic convention and participatory process was opened up for one last time. The US media control, spin doctors & money talks every election after the 1972- show that this was one last noble experiment. Interviews are great- Warren Beatty, Gary Hart, Dick Gregory. The shooting of George Wallace raises MORE QUESTIONS about our government. Thomas Eagleton was not researched before getting the VP nod-- and they blame HUMPHREY for that. This may be a “let's blame everyone else when we stink film”-- but it really sheds a cogent theme that today's Iraq “peaceniks" better keep in mind for the 2008 election. George- we won't forget you-- and remember the bumper sticks- "Don't Blame me, I'm from Massachusetts!!"

    Yes   |   No

     
    Bernie W.

    I'm not sure what film Ralph G was watching. The New York Times called the film "well-researched," Muskie was not replaced as VP but rather Thomas Eagleton, and the point that the campaign is left to the last 15 minutes of the film is utterly false. And of course the Vietnam War was ranted against - that ongoing rant defined George McGovern's career. It's a cornerstone of the film.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Ralph G.

    The movie is alleged to be about McGovern’s ‘72 campaign against Nixon. Only the last 15 minutes is. Totally unresearched, they attribute McGovern’s stunning defeat to the fact his convention acceptance speech was broadcast at 2:30 AM and Muskie having to be replaced as his VP. The rest of the movie is a rant against the Viet Nam war, political contemporaries of McGovern, Democratic or Republican, and McGovern’s bio.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 3 Reviews