Capote (2005) Reviews

Capote (2005)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
The creation of one of the most memorable books of the 1960s -- and the impact the writing and research would have on its author -- is explored in this drama based on a true story. In 1959, Truman Capote (played by Philip Seymour Hoffman) was a critically acclaimed novelist who had earned a small degree of celebrity for his work when he read a short newspaper item about a multiple murder in a small Kansas town. For some reason, the story fascinated Capote, and he asked William Shawn (Bob Balaban), his editor at The New Yorker, to let him write a piece about the case. Capote had long believed that in the right hands, a true story could be molded into a tale as compelling as any fiction, and he believed this event, in which the brutal and unimaginable was visited upon a community where it was least expected, could be just the right material. Capote traveled to Kansas with his close friend Harper Lee (Catherine Keener), herself becoming a major literary figure with the success of To Kill a Mockingbird, and while Capote's effete and mannered personal style stuck out like a sore thumb in Kansas, in time he gained the trust of Alvin Dewey (Chris Cooper), the Kansas Bureau of Investigation agent investigating the murder of the Clutter family, and with his help Capote's magazine piece grew into a full-length book. Capote also became familiar with the petty criminals who killed the Clutter family, Dick Hickock (Mark Pellegrino) and Perry Smith (Clifton Collins Jr.), and in Smith he found a troubling kindred spirit more like himself than he wanted to admit. After attaining a sort of friendship with Smith under the assumption that the man would be executed before the book was ever published, Capote finds himself forced to directly confront the moral implications of his actions with regards to both his role in the man's death, and the way that he would be remembered. Capote also co-stars Bruce Greenwood as Capote's longtime companion Jack Dunphy, and Amy Ryan as Mary Dewey, Alvin's wife who became a confidante of Capote's. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide

Read More


Starring:
Philip Seymour HoffmanCatherine Keener, (more)
Director(s):
Bennett Miller
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD,  (View All Versions)
 

Movies Similar to Capote

See More

Average Ratings

(141 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Glenn B.

I'm glad this didn't win the Best Picture award. It wasn't that kind of material; it does not exist to entertain masses and have an intriguing mystery, it exists to portray an eccentric character who lost his soul to a town out in Kansas. For that, Hoffman aced the Best Actor award 100 percent. This movie is not for everybody, however. While I never found it to be boring, it was an overall slow movie with practically no distinguishable height of events (a climax) and pretty much no defined beginning either. It's a chunk of a man's life, when he decided to write a book and got involved over his head with his greed and his affection for one of the killers. Hoffman is chilling, and probably worth the movie itself just to watch it.

Yes   |   No


Linda D.

As character studies go - this one is beyond genius. The multi-layers of Capote's personality pull off like onion skins and the air between each layer. Interestingly enough - his persona is demonstrated much the way Capote wrote himself. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was outstanding. He (or anyone else) could not have done a better job at capturing the essence of Capote. I grew up in the 50s and 60s and remember Capote very well. What I want to say here is there are a lot of movie out these days on the lives of famous people (example Ray, Cash, etc) and those were wonderful impersonations. But Hoffmans portrayal of Capote was not only an impersonation. He truly channeled Capote's soul in such a way that I was really quite astonished as how spot ON he was. It was quite beautiful to watch an actor in such an exquisite performance. Truly took my breath away. The acting, the supporting roles, the writing, the direction - everything about this movie was perfection

Yes   |   No


Ed K.

I believe this film should have actually been called The Phillip Seymour Hoffman Show. His performance as Capote was one of hte most brilliant acting performances I have ever seen. The movie was alright, but it would have been better if there had been a little more biographical information rather than just the writing of In Cold Blood. Still, I have to say it was a good movie to watch one time and recommend it.

Yes   |   No


Paul L.

Interesting, suspenseful, well acted and directed... we liked it. For me, it was one of those movies that prompted me to read more about Truman Capote. I am also going to look for his books. Fascinating story.

Yes   |   No


Deborah M.

I found myself captivated with not only this story, but with the vivid depiction of Capote the bon vivant contrasted with Capote the person. My experience with Truman Capote was limited to him as a character in "To Kill A Mockingbird," as an author of powerful short stories, and as a caricature in his later life on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. I was unable to reconcile all these people, but "Capote" helped bring them all into focus. As a movie, "Capote" ranks high as a character study. The acting was very good, and the fact that the movie was filmed in black and white (as was "In Cold Blood")is appropriate, and adds to the feeling of the movie's time period. I understand why Truman Capote never finished another book. He would have found it impossible to once more so desperately risk his emotional well being, and only by desperately risking his emotional well being was he able to write.

Yes   |   No


Jen T.

Good solid movie. Well-written, well-directed, well-acted. Capote was quite a fascinating character.

Yes   |   No


Samuel F.

The makers of lunesta and ambien have competitions....

Yes   |   No


Cathryn B.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman is an actor I want to see more of in movies. He embodied Truman Capote totally, and carried the viewer through his obsession with the murder story. Well worth seeing again.

Yes   |   No


Isabel M.

It is good since the beginning. I mean, the acting, the movement, the dialogue, everything. Seymour Hoffman truly deserved the oscar for this performance because he was so amazing. The only thing I didn't like is that the murders themselves, were not shown very clearly. They were sort of skimmed through and the horror of the act itself was not imprinted deeply enough. But you still feel the tragedy for that poor family and the injustice of it all; that they had to even be subjected to it. But it is well worth your time and viewing.

Yes   |   No


Robin B.

Don't waste your time. This movie was so very boring. A gay Capote (perhaps that is why so many loved it, promoting the gay life style) uses his influence to gain access to 2 men who murder an entire family. But gay or straight this move was a bomb. Not worth the time it took to watch it. BORING!!!

Yes   |   No


BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $10.99

IN-STORE

YOUR REVIEW
WRITE A REVIEW
 

Member Reviews (141)

 
Glenn B.

I'm glad this didn't win the Best Picture award. It wasn't that kind of material; it does not exist to entertain masses and have an intriguing mystery, it exists to portray an eccentric character who lost his soul to a town out in Kansas. For that, Hoffman aced the Best Actor award 100 percent. This movie is not for everybody, however. While I never found it to be boring, it was an overall slow movie with practically no distinguishable height of events (a climax) and pretty much no defined beginning either. It's a chunk of a man's life, when he decided to write a book and got involved over his head with his greed and his affection for one of the killers. Hoffman is chilling, and probably worth the movie itself just to watch it.

Yes   |   No

 
Linda D.

As character studies go - this one is beyond genius. The multi-layers of Capote's personality pull off like onion skins and the air between each layer. Interestingly enough - his persona is demonstrated much the way Capote wrote himself. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was outstanding. He (or anyone else) could not have done a better job at capturing the essence of Capote. I grew up in the 50s and 60s and remember Capote very well. What I want to say here is there are a lot of movie out these days on the lives of famous people (example Ray, Cash, etc) and those were wonderful impersonations. But Hoffmans portrayal of Capote was not only an impersonation. He truly channeled Capote's soul in such a way that I was really quite astonished as how spot ON he was. It was quite beautiful to watch an actor in such an exquisite performance. Truly took my breath away. The acting, the supporting roles, the writing, the direction - everything about this movie was perfection

Yes   |   No

 
Ed K.

I believe this film should have actually been called The Phillip Seymour Hoffman Show. His performance as Capote was one of hte most brilliant acting performances I have ever seen. The movie was alright, but it would have been better if there had been a little more biographical information rather than just the writing of In Cold Blood. Still, I have to say it was a good movie to watch one time and recommend it.

Yes   |   No

 
Read All Capote Reviews
 
Start Your Free Trial Today
 

BLOCKBUSTER name, design and related marks are trademarks of Blockbuster Inc. © 2010 Blockbuster Inc. All rights reserved.

Portions of Content Provided by All Movie Guide ®, a trademark of All Media Guide, LLC.© 2010 All Media Guide, LLC.