Once Upon a Time in America (1984) Reviews

Once Upon a Time in America (1984)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Though some viewers might be put off by its length, graphic violence, and absence of likable characters, Sergio Leone's final film is also a cinematic masterpiece. Spanning four decades, the film tells the story of David "Noodles" Aaronson (Robert De Niro) and his Jewish pals, chronicling their childhoods on New York's Lower East Side in the 1920s, through their gangster careers in the 1930s, and culminating in Noodles' 1968 return to New York from self-imposed exile, at which time he learns the truth about the fate of his friends and again confronts the nightmare of his past. The acting, the re-creation of the time period, the cinematography, and the music are all superb. However, even more important is Leone's ability to make the film work on so many different levels: it's both a criticism of gangster-film mythology and a continuation of the director's exploration of the issues of time and history. Strange as it may seem, the violence and gore in the first half of the film turn into a sad elegy about wasted lives and lost love. The film's strengths emerge only in its full 229-minute version -- the 139-minute and other edited versions don't make nearly the same impact. ~ Yuri German, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Robert De NiroJames Woods, (more)
Director(s):
Sergio Leone
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray  | Digital SD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(75 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Steven R.

I consider myself to be a strong movie critic, especially with pictures from the 1970's and 80's, this is the best picture i have ever seen, even better than The Godfather. Direction (Sergio Leone), acting (Robert Deniro James Woods, and many other stars), etc. This film is a masterpiece in every sense of the word. The 1984 Academy Award is a fraud, Amadeus isn't half the movie this is. Whatever you do, see this film.

Yes   |   No


Jeff W.

The story is very good and the premise is intriguing. The acting is excellent. The sets and cinematography are excellent. But as others have said, they apparently were reluctant to leave any film on the cutting room floor. Scenes have a tempo that drags on and on. One review cited the coffee stirring and the phone ringing as good examples. There are what seem like hundreds more in this long-because-we-can-make-it-long period movie. For those of you who believe those of us complainers aren't smart enough to appreciate a movie longer than 1.5 hours, guess again. With proper editing it could have been shorter than 3 hours with NONE of the storyline being sacrificed. My frustration comes when I really do want to experience what the director/writer want to say but it seems like they can't get out of their own way long enough say it effectively. Watch it if you have the time. After the first 1.5 hours it accelerates from 2 mph to 10 mph, so be patient.

Yes   |   No


David J.

I think this is the best gangster film of all time. It is long and kind of slow but the movie is great. A must see if you love gangster films!!!

Yes   |   No


Ted S.

.

Yes   |   No


Patrick G.

Great movie but it seems like too much detail for some parts and not enough in other parts.

Yes   |   No


Vincent J.

This is a great movie to rent. This is just like The Good Bad and the Ugly. Sergio Leone pulls it out and makes it a long movie. But everything has its place. This is a great movie. A bit long but the outcome is worth it.

Yes   |   No


Thomas D.

According to the "special features" clip on Sergio Leone's making of the film, he was quoted as saying he didn't like the way the film was edited for American audiences. He put his soul into making it and the editor surgically removed it. Too bad: so much talent and effort diluted.

Yes   |   No


Thomas L.

a story that never delivers, the plot line is predictable, and leaves several loose ends. Almost gratuitous with its presentation of adolescent sexuality. Really stands far behind the man with no name trilogy as far as cinematography is concerned, but still has some exquisite locations. Final word: don't waste your time with this one.

Yes   |   No


Tim S.

Sorry, kids--despite flawless cinematography, art direction, and fine acting ,this pretentious "epic' lacks soul. Not one character is even remotely likable. DeNiro plays a lowlife rapist, and the overdone Morricone music is used as a desperate substitute for earned emotional response to the plight of these sleazebags. The genius of the "Godfather" flicks, is that you actually learn to like the people portrayed.

Yes   |   No


Louis P.

This movie is an incoherent, amateurish, rudderless mess. I cannot for the life of me figure out why anyone would praise this film other than it was Sergio Leone's last and he gets a pass on the actual movie, like Scorsese did on "The Departed." Honestly, "The Departed" is a masterpiece compared to this laughable outing. And when I say laughable, I mean there's acting and dialogue that's laugh-out-loud bad; wincing, cringing bad. I had nothing but pity for the actors involved.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $20.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 3 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Steven R.

    I consider myself to be a strong movie critic, especially with pictures from the 1970's and 80's, this is the best picture i have ever seen, even better than The Godfather. Direction (Sergio Leone), acting (Robert Deniro James Woods, and many other stars), etc. This film is a masterpiece in every sense of the word. The 1984 Academy Award is a fraud, Amadeus isn't half the movie this is. Whatever you do, see this film.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Jeff W.

    The story is very good and the premise is intriguing. The acting is excellent. The sets and cinematography are excellent. But as others have said, they apparently were reluctant to leave any film on the cutting room floor. Scenes have a tempo that drags on and on. One review cited the coffee stirring and the phone ringing as good examples. There are what seem like hundreds more in this long-because-we-can-make-it-long period movie. For those of you who believe those of us complainers aren't smart enough to appreciate a movie longer than 1.5 hours, guess again. With proper editing it could have been shorter than 3 hours with NONE of the storyline being sacrificed. My frustration comes when I really do want to experience what the director/writer want to say but it seems like they can't get out of their own way long enough say it effectively. Watch it if you have the time. After the first 1.5 hours it accelerates from 2 mph to 10 mph, so be patient.

    Yes   |   No

     
    David J.

    I think this is the best gangster film of all time. It is long and kind of slow but the movie is great. A must see if you love gangster films!!!

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 75 Reviews