Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973) Reviews

Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
The fifth and last of the original series of motion pictures based upon author Pierre Boulle's imaginative novel Monkey Planet, this science fiction film was the least-liked by the series' legion of fans. Roddy McDowall returns as Caesar, the rebellious intelligent chimp of the previous film, Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972). Caesar led his brethren in a revolution against their human masters earlier, but humanity has since nearly destroyed itself in a nuclear apocalypse, and survivors are second-class citizens within ape society. Now a beneficent ruler of his people, Caesar encourages a fragile, peaceful coexistence with humans, despite the protests of militaristic gorilla leader General Aldo (Claude Akins). When Caesar learns that recordings of his murdered parents may exist in the Forbidden City, he journeys to the irradiated wasteland with the human MacDonald (Austin Stoker) and the wise orangutan Virgil (Paul Williams). Although Caesar finds what he's looking for, he also attracts unwanted attention: mutant humans who still dwell underground in the devastated war zone follow the search party back home, leading to a climactic battle and Aldo's tragic challenge of Caesar's authority. Suffering greatly due to penny-pinching studio 20th Century Fox's low budget, Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973) is most notable for a cameo by director John Huston as an ape named "The Lawgiver," who appears in a wraparound segment. ~ Karl Williams, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Roddy McDowallClaude Akins, (more)
Director(s):
J. Lee Thompson
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
G
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(2 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Shawn A.

It's a shame the movie wasn't given a larger budget. The cast is good but the movie suffers from low production quality which ends in a a poorly executed climactic battle for the planet. The movie's premise is big but it's hard to believe the apes & humans are fighting for control of the planet when there only appear to be 50 of them fighting.

Yes   |   No


Robert M.

Planet of the Apes was the first movie to churn out a series of sequels, each sequel worse than the last. The studio strangled the sequels with declining budgets, and this last one was as low as they could go. You can forgive cheesy special effects, but the lousy acting and poor camera work combined with a lousy script and uninspired story line reduces this to a drinking movie where you take a drink every time someone says "ape." That's the movie's only value.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Shawn A.

    It's a shame the movie wasn't given a larger budget. The cast is good but the movie suffers from low production quality which ends in a a poorly executed climactic battle for the planet. The movie's premise is big but it's hard to believe the apes & humans are fighting for control of the planet when there only appear to be 50 of them fighting.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Robert M.

    Planet of the Apes was the first movie to churn out a series of sequels, each sequel worse than the last. The studio strangled the sequels with declining budgets, and this last one was as low as they could go. You can forgive cheesy special effects, but the lousy acting and poor camera work combined with a lousy script and uninspired story line reduces this to a drinking movie where you take a drink every time someone says "ape." That's the movie's only value.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 2 Reviews