The Naked Kiss (1964) Reviews

The Naked Kiss (1964)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Kelly (Constance Towers), a prostitute who wants to transform her life, beats up her pimp, takes the 75 dollars he owes her, and leaves town. Winding up in the small town of Grantville, she turns a trick with Griff (Anthony Eisley), who is actually the sheriff. After paying her for sex, Griff tells Kelly that Grantville is a clean town and orders her out, though he refers her to a brothel in a neighboring city. Instead, Kelly makes a final break with her past and becomes a nurse's aide at the local children's hospital. In that capacity, she meets Grant (Michael Dante), who is a benefactor of the hospital, a descendant of the town's founder -- and Griff's best friend. As Grant and Kelly fall in love, Griff viciously accuses Kelly of using her hospital job to hide ongoing illicit activities. When Kelly tells Grant about her past, he seems to accept her without reservation and proposes marriage; however, Kelly soon learns the perverse truth about her fiancée and takes matters into her own hands. Samuel Fuller's raw film noir exposes the hypocrisy of a supposedly proper society. Beneath the veneer of respectability lies an exploitive abuse of power, no different from that of any pimp. ~ Steve Press, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Constance TowersAnthony Eisley, (more)
Director(s):
Samuel Fuller
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(5 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Thomas W.

I have mixed feelings about this one. I don't really mind the questionable acting and dialog. It is, after all, pulp. But the movie rarely builds any tension. There's a bit of a shocking moment about two-thirds of he way through that picks up the energy level a little, but then it dies down again.

Yes   |   No


Scott W.

This was a fantastic movie with surprising modern day issues. It does get a little slow at times, but the action when it happens is either funny to watch or shockingly unexpected. It's hard to imagine someone writing, directing and producing such a movie during the '60s time period. You really should pay attention to the script and the lines for the social parallels, i.e. a travelling saleswoman selling champagne actually being synonymous with selling something else.

Yes   |   No


JOHN S.

Love it when older movies can be just as wicked as the stuff that's pumped out today. And they had to be so much more creative back then to not attract the sensors wrath. Guilty pleasure movie.

Yes   |   No


Carol L.

Constance Towers was good as Kelly. Sam Fuller movies are very different from todays. He still gets his point across without showing the actual acts.

Yes   |   No


James V.

Leave it to Sam Fuller to combine pederasty, prostitution, physical rehab for kids & salvation for adults into one shocking, funny, jaw-dropping "camp" fest. (Back in 1964, too, before Hollywood began making more adult movies.) I'm sure Fuller didn't intend his film as camp, but that's what it is today. Yet he's such a good moviemaker that he carries you from that breathless lulu of an opening to his leading lady's "encounter" with the madam to a musical number that would not be out of place in "The Sound of Music." . And through it all shines Fuller's insistence on honesty and second chances. THE NAKED KISS is so enjoyable and surprising that it lands smack dab in the must-see realm. The gorgeous, statuesque Constance Towers proves perfect as Kelly, Anthony Eisley is properly macho/nasty as her cop nemesis & the creepily pretty Michael Dante makes a wonderfully wrong Mr. Right. Watch for Russ Meyer's own Edy Williams in a small but "prominent" role. Golly gumdrops: this one's FUN!

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  from $22.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Thomas W.

    I have mixed feelings about this one. I don't really mind the questionable acting and dialog. It is, after all, pulp. But the movie rarely builds any tension. There's a bit of a shocking moment about two-thirds of he way through that picks up the energy level a little, but then it dies down again.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Scott W.

    This was a fantastic movie with surprising modern day issues. It does get a little slow at times, but the action when it happens is either funny to watch or shockingly unexpected. It's hard to imagine someone writing, directing and producing such a movie during the '60s time period. You really should pay attention to the script and the lines for the social parallels, i.e. a travelling saleswoman selling champagne actually being synonymous with selling something else.

    Yes   |   No

     
    JOHN S.

    Love it when older movies can be just as wicked as the stuff that's pumped out today. And they had to be so much more creative back then to not attract the sensors wrath. Guilty pleasure movie.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 5 Reviews