Barbarella (1968) Reviews

Barbarella (1968)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
A voluptuous outer space agent travels to another galaxy in search of a missing inventor in this science fiction send-up. Barbarella (Jane Fonda), an interstellar representative of the united Earth government in the 41st century, is dispatched to locate scientist Durand Durand, whose positronic ray, if not recovered, could signal the end of humanity. Outfitted in an array of stunning Star Trek/Bond girl outfits and cruising around in a plush, psychedelic spaceship, Barbarella travels to the Tau Seti system and promptly crash-lands. She then spends the rest of the film discovering the joys of interstellar sex with a keeper of feral children (Ugo Tognazzi), a blind, beatific angel (John Phillip Law), and an inept revolutionary named Dildano (David Hemmings). Slowly but surely, she also finds her way to Durand Durand by moving from one exotic, Wizard of Oz-style locale to another. Along the way, she meets the kindly Professor Ping (a surprisingly verbal Marcel Marceau), a Eurotrash dominatrix named the Great Tyrant (Rolling Stones gal pal Anita Pallenberg), and the Concierge (Milo O'Shea), a strangely familiar lackey of the Great Tyrant who tries to destroy Barbarella with his great big organ of love. Jean-Claude Forest, who created the character Barbarella in 1962 for V-Magazine, served as visual advisor on the adaptation. The film's missing scientist character famously inspired the band name of '80s pop stars Duran Duran (who altered the spelling slightly). Almost two decades later, the film also inspired electronic act Matmos, which was named after the aqueous personification of evil unleashed by the Concierge at the movie's climax. ~ Brian J. Dillard, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Jane FondaJohn Phillip Law, (more)
Director(s):
Roger Vadim
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
PG
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray  | Digital SD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(23 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


James W.

Campy? Yes! Exploitive? Yes! But still one of the best comic book based films of all time. Not to be taken seriously, but definately to be enjoyed.

Yes   |   No


Jim R.

Don't miss the start of the movie! When she is slowly removing her spacesuit, it will definitely hold your attention. The rest of the movie has interesting costumes and unusual sets.

Yes   |   No


Steven C.

Cheesy and boring, but bearable because Jane Fonda was easy to watch. The opening credits say the movie was inspired by the best-selling book. I'll bet that those who were familiar with the book / comics got a lot more out of this movie. A lot of plot elements that didn't make sense to me were probably more fully described in print.

Yes   |   No


Steve M.

OK, so you don't expect much from the special effects for a '60's Sci-Fi film, but the story is what's really laughable. That and Jane's acting. The ONLY treat in this turkey, is Jane in one sexy outfit after another.She was smoking hot back then. It's hard to believe she ever got another role after this.

Yes   |   No


Alejandro T.

much sexier than I expected -- not a date movie, unless you are into kitch

Yes   |   No


Steven G.

Vadim (her husband): "We will make this silly book into a motion picture, and fill the screen with tantalizing shots of my naked American wife." De Laurentis (producer): "Yes! And many more shots with skimpy costumes, too!" I saw this as a college student at an art house cinema in 1980 and enjoyed the laughter and guffaws at this silly movie. weak plot, cheap effects. jane in sexy costumes was the only good part. THIS IS WITHOUT DOUBT THE BEST WORK JANE EVER DID! had she stayed with this type of material we could all love and respect her today. Interesting side note -- her winged companion lent his name to a famous 80's pop band -- Duran Duran.

Yes   |   No


Marc L.

Jane Fonda is hot

Yes   |   No


Mary S.

Poor Jane! Poor, poor Jane. The story isn't unlike several Star Trek (the original series) episodes strung together minus a crew, and the sets were potentially even better, however, even before anybody can begin to care about the story, they can't help but stifle a gag reflex over the, uh, can it even possibly be called music? And just when you do think you can wrap your head around the upchuck music, you get treated to some rather sickening attempts to speed up the tempo of the movie by watching only every other frame or so of some VERY tedious, boring sequences. If you can avoid regurgitation to these directorial & editorial stupidities, you might just actually enjoy this flick, like I have to say I might have.

Yes   |   No


Michael C.

I expected a stupid sci-fi movie with bad special effects and a small amount of nudity. And that was exactly what I got. It's a decent classic Sci-Fi flick, but unless you were in the mood for classic Sci-Fi I'd say contemperary sci-fi (Like the movie Firestarter) is better because it has better special effects with a plot that's just as average.

Yes   |   No


Robert F.

If your IQ is above 90, you will barely be able to sit through this movie to the anti-climactic end. OK, I assume it's supposed to be a campy movie, but I could make a better movie with my handy cam and call it campy too. If you expect to see much of Jane Fonda in the altogether, you'll be disappointed - but not that much. Jane Fonda isn't ugly, but she's not a great beauty either.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 
Buy New  $6.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND


Available to:  Watch on 3 devices.
See system requirements.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    James W.

    Campy? Yes! Exploitive? Yes! But still one of the best comic book based films of all time. Not to be taken seriously, but definately to be enjoyed.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Jim R.

    Don't miss the start of the movie! When she is slowly removing her spacesuit, it will definitely hold your attention. The rest of the movie has interesting costumes and unusual sets.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Steven C.

    Cheesy and boring, but bearable because Jane Fonda was easy to watch. The opening credits say the movie was inspired by the best-selling book. I'll bet that those who were familiar with the book / comics got a lot more out of this movie. A lot of plot elements that didn't make sense to me were probably more fully described in print.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 23 Reviews