Martin (1978) Reviews

Martin (1978)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Nearly a decade after George A. Romero changed the face of modern horror films with Night of the Living Dead -- and following the less successful projects Season of the Witch and The Crazies -- the Pittsburgh-based auteur returned to top form with this superb vampire tale. Set in a rapidly crumbling steeltown suburb, the story focuses on shy, moody Martin (John Amplas), a teenager of East European descent who may or may not be a vampire. Though he possesses no fangs or supernatural powers and has no aversions to either crucifixes or garlic, Martin is nevertheless compelled to drug pretty young women, slash them with razor blades, and consume their blood. His motivations seem purely psychological -- as revealed to a call-in radio talk show where Martin has become an anonymous celebrity -- but the notion of a family vampire curse is fostered by Martin's stoic uncle Cuda Lincoln Maazel, who is convinced that he must destroy the boy by hammering a stake through his heart. Romero's superb script keeps the film's supernatural questions ambiguous, focusing instead on the characters' inner turmoil as modern-day attitudes and values clash with vanishing Old World traditions. Filmed on an extremely low budget, Martin benefits from its gritty, kitchen-sink realism, making the outbursts of graphic horror even more surreal and disturbing and creating a sense of doom that builds to a tragically ironic climax. ~ Cavett Binion, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
John AmplasLincoln Maazel, (more)
Director(s):
George A. Romero
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(15 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


James E.

Romero describes this as on of his best horror pictures, I would have to disagree, the DAWN OF THE DEAD (1972). I like the vampire movies as much as the other horror fan, but this one just don't hit home as a vampire film its more of a modern day blood letting. Still Martin is a decent movie, does have alot of filler.

Yes   |   No


Edward S.

I have seen interviews with Romero saying that he feels this is one of his best plot lines, and I agree. A modern day vampire movie (mid 1970's), filmed on the usual Romero shoestring budget. The story line is entertaining and with the proper re-write, could be remade to a box office blockbuster. Pittsburgher's will appreciate the scenes on the old Liberty Avenue and some of the old neighborhoods.

Yes   |   No


Chris W.

This is an interesting take on Vampires. Originality is way up there, I'll give Romero that. It's kinda creepy the procedure Martin goes through to get his meal. A little dry in some parts, but definitely worth a look.

Yes   |   No


Maya W.

slow at times. i couldn't feel anything for the lead character, because his shyness just made me laugh. other than the lead, all the actors were terrible. worth watchin if your into vamp flicks. NOT Romero's best.

Yes   |   No


Mary V.

It's more about the seventies than it is about vampires. It focuses on themes of stagflation, generation gap, and growing secularism above the supernatural. Yes, it's slow, but the final scene makes it all worth it. This is one of Romero's best.

Yes   |   No


Steven R.

Romero definitely has a talent for making the weird seem 'normal', even mundane. This was an interesting take on the vampire story... a little disturbing in some places, but I don't remember ever feeling 'sorry' for a vampire before... even the modern 'Twilight' stories lack a depth (I use that term loosely - it is a vampire story after all...) that this character is given... and there's enough weirdness to make you question what is real or imaginary.

Yes   |   No


Jonathan S.

The movie is dated, for sure. Obviously made with a very low budget, but with decent acting. An interesting topic, psychological vampirism. This is a Saturday afternoon watch, when you've got nothing else to do but kill an hour and a half when the kids aren't around.

Yes   |   No


Rhonda N.

I'm not a fan of gore for no reason -esp when it comes to abusing women or sexual abuses. There is nothing entertaining about that.

Yes   |   No


Tammy B.

This is not a good movie. It had potential, but falls very disappointingly short. They could have done much more with the storyline of how the family became "cursed". Much more background on that score would have made the movie much more interesting. Some of the nude scenes were fairly erotic, but again, finally fell short, especially the initial one. All in all, there are much better vampire movies out there. Two stars.

Yes   |   No


Theodore S.

I did not get to watch "Martin" due to the fact that the disc was cracked that you sent me. I would appriciate it if you could resend an undamaged disc of "Martin". Thank you!

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    James E.

    Romero describes this as on of his best horror pictures, I would have to disagree, the DAWN OF THE DEAD (1972). I like the vampire movies as much as the other horror fan, but this one just don't hit home as a vampire film its more of a modern day blood letting. Still Martin is a decent movie, does have alot of filler.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Edward S.

    I have seen interviews with Romero saying that he feels this is one of his best plot lines, and I agree. A modern day vampire movie (mid 1970's), filmed on the usual Romero shoestring budget. The story line is entertaining and with the proper re-write, could be remade to a box office blockbuster. Pittsburgher's will appreciate the scenes on the old Liberty Avenue and some of the old neighborhoods.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Chris W.

    This is an interesting take on Vampires. Originality is way up there, I'll give Romero that. It's kinda creepy the procedure Martin goes through to get his meal. A little dry in some parts, but definitely worth a look.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 15 Reviews