 | JOHN S. |
7 out of 7 people found this review helpful
Move is just too dated. Scary the first time around but if you are repeat viewing from 20 yrs ago it just doesn't entertain. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | James V. |
5 out of 5 people found this review helpful
I found MAGIC tiresome and obvious when it made its debut way-back-when but, after reading a nice NY Times review around the time the film was supposed to appear on DVD, I thought perhaps I was too young to have appreciated it. Now, after viewing over half of the movie again, it still seems tiresome and obvious. Although it's fun to watch Ann-Margaret in just about anything, to see Anthony Hopkins so young again, and to enjoy Burgess Meredith in an especially good role, the story, screenplay and direction (first two by William Goldman, the latter by Sir Richard Attenborough) are lackluster: ugly--without the depth to warrant that ugliness--and slow. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Scott O. |
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
Anthony Hopkins does a nice job but I was kind of rooting for this one to end. This one is hard to get through. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Doug V. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
Entertaining film, if not for Anthony Hopkins' young, split personality character, than for the ventriliquist effect alone. Support cast of Meredith and Margaret were decent as well. Creepy scenes, give it a try. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Ronald B. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
THis was a re-visit of this movie. Had not seen it since the first release. Remembered how wonderful Hopkins and Margret are in the movie. Ann Margret's performance is shattering. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Michelle S. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
Nothing like the twilite zone version. Enjoyed it creepy not too scarry. Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Don H. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
yeah this movie is dated but it gave me the creeps! I hate ventriloquist dummies always have,always will Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Jack and Carol D. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
it was a little too violent but it was very interesting about the dual personality Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | Gabriel R. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
OK, so this movie is old, and I hadn't seen it when it first came out. What drew me to watch it was that Anthony Hopkins is in it. Guess what, I LIKED IT ! It is the story of a man going mad, off his rocker, just trying to get by in his proffession. He makes it in his work, a crummy magician, because he turns it into a ventriloquist act, but only because the dummy is telling people off, saying what Hopkins can't say on stage himself. Eventually he believes the dummy is alive, and ... well... he's NUTS . Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|
 | John E. |
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful
I remember watching this movie "back in the day" sometime around 1979. A pretty good movie except for a few things that bothered me about it. First, the overall lighting in the movie was too dark or muted for me. Maybe it was the look that the cinematographer was aiming for...who knows. If that was his goal, he achieved it. Also, I felt Anthony Hopkin's New Yorker accent was way too exaggerated, until it became super irritating half way through the movie. However, even though the story was predictable, I still enjoyed it. Only Anthony Hopkins could play this role and he did very well - great casting call on that one. "Fats" is my favorite character, who I find his exaggerated, New Yorker accent perfect - just for him. Of course it's always great to see the original eye candy, Ms. Anne Marget who added a touch of wholesomeness to the movie when ever she's on. All in all, I still found the movie enjoyable - four stars, mainly for "Fats". Was this review helpful? Yes
|
No
|