Magic (1978) Reviews

Magic (1978)
Member Rating:  
Anthony Hopkins is a ventriloquist psychologically tormented by his dummy in the Richard Attenborough thriller Magic (a film with a story that may seem familiar to those who have seen the Michael Redgrave segment of Dead of Night, or the Cliff Robertson episode "The Dummy" from The Twilight Zone television series). William Goldman based his screenplay on his best-selling novel. Hopkins plays Corky, a seedy magician who is hooted off the stage in the low-rent clubs that will stoop to hire him. But when he comes across a dummy named Fats, his career is energized. Corky sees in Fats everything he lacks himself -- confidence, creativity, and verbal agility. With the help of his agent Ben Greene (Burgess Meredith), Corky rises to the top of the nightclub circuit. But with Corky's success comes an increased paranoia, and he turns down a TV contract, believing that it would mean taking a medical examination and that rumors of his mental instability might leak out. Corky takes off to a Catskills resort, run by Peggy Ann Snow (Ann-Margret), an old girlfriend now unhappily married to a volatile hick (Ed Lauter). While a frustrated Ben high tails it to the Catskills to find Corky, Corky discovers that he still has feelings for Peggy, but lands in the middle of a love triangle between the woman and her husband, where his schizophrenic personality manifests itself and additional murders occur. ~ Paul Brenner, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Anthony HopkinsAnn-Margret, (more)
Director(s):
Richard Attenborough
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
R
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(10 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


JOHN S.

Move is just too dated. Scary the first time around but if you are repeat viewing from 20 yrs ago it just doesn't entertain.

Yes   |   No


James V.

I found MAGIC tiresome and obvious when it made its debut way-back-when but, after reading a nice NY Times review around the time the film was supposed to appear on DVD, I thought perhaps I was too young to have appreciated it. Now, after viewing over half of the movie again, it still seems tiresome and obvious. Although it's fun to watch Ann-Margaret in just about anything, to see Anthony Hopkins so young again, and to enjoy Burgess Meredith in an especially good role, the story, screenplay and direction (first two by William Goldman, the latter by Sir Richard Attenborough) are lackluster: ugly--without the depth to warrant that ugliness--and slow.

Yes   |   No


Scott O.

Anthony Hopkins does a nice job but I was kind of rooting for this one to end. This one is hard to get through.

Yes   |   No


Doug V.

Entertaining film, if not for Anthony Hopkins' young, split personality character, than for the ventriliquist effect alone. Support cast of Meredith and Margaret were decent as well. Creepy scenes, give it a try.

Yes   |   No


Ronald B.

THis was a re-visit of this movie. Had not seen it since the first release. Remembered how wonderful Hopkins and Margret are in the movie. Ann Margret's performance is shattering.

Yes   |   No


Michelle S.

Nothing like the twilite zone version. Enjoyed it creepy not too scarry.

Yes   |   No


Don H.

yeah this movie is dated but it gave me the creeps! I hate ventriloquist dummies always have,always will

Yes   |   No


Jack and Carol D.

it was a little too violent but it was very interesting about the dual personality

Yes   |   No


Gabriel R.

OK, so this movie is old, and I hadn't seen it when it first came out. What drew me to watch it was that Anthony Hopkins is in it. Guess what, I LIKED IT ! It is the story of a man going mad, off his rocker, just trying to get by in his proffession. He makes it in his work, a crummy magician, because he turns it into a ventriloquist act, but only because the dummy is telling people off, saying what Hopkins can't say on stage himself. Eventually he believes the dummy is alive, and ... well... he's NUTS .

Yes   |   No


John E.

I remember watching this movie "back in the day" sometime around 1979. A pretty good movie except for a few things that bothered me about it. First, the overall lighting in the movie was too dark or muted for me. Maybe it was the look that the cinematographer was aiming for...who knows. If that was his goal, he achieved it. Also, I felt Anthony Hopkin's New Yorker accent was way too exaggerated, until it became super irritating half way through the movie. However, even though the story was predictable, I still enjoyed it. Only Anthony Hopkins could play this role and he did very well - great casting call on that one. "Fats" is my favorite character, who I find his exaggerated, New Yorker accent perfect - just for him. Of course it's always great to see the original eye candy, Ms. Anne Marget who added a touch of wholesomeness to the movie when ever she's on. All in all, I still found the movie enjoyable - four stars, mainly for "Fats".

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  from $15.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    JOHN S.

    Move is just too dated. Scary the first time around but if you are repeat viewing from 20 yrs ago it just doesn't entertain.

    Yes   |   No

     
    James V.

    I found MAGIC tiresome and obvious when it made its debut way-back-when but, after reading a nice NY Times review around the time the film was supposed to appear on DVD, I thought perhaps I was too young to have appreciated it. Now, after viewing over half of the movie again, it still seems tiresome and obvious. Although it's fun to watch Ann-Margaret in just about anything, to see Anthony Hopkins so young again, and to enjoy Burgess Meredith in an especially good role, the story, screenplay and direction (first two by William Goldman, the latter by Sir Richard Attenborough) are lackluster: ugly--without the depth to warrant that ugliness--and slow.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Scott O.

    Anthony Hopkins does a nice job but I was kind of rooting for this one to end. This one is hard to get through.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 10 Reviews