Naqoyqatsi (2002) Reviews

Naqoyqatsi (2002)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Filmmaker, philosopher and activist Godfrey Reggio completes the film trilogy he began with Koyaanisqatsi and Powaqqatsi in this visually striking examination of the impact of technology upon our culture. Naqoyqatsi is a word from the Hopi language which roughly translates as "war as a way of life" or "a life of killing each other," and in this film Reggio uses a intense barrage of images - most of which have been drawn from existing film footage and then altered using a variety of optical and digital techniques - to express his belief that technology is no longer at war with nature. Instead, we have allowed technology to become the "nature" in which we live, and as it stretches our physical and emotional environment in new and troubling directions, we have created for ourselves a world of greater chaos, violence, and confusion. As with his previous features in this trilogy, Naqoyqatsi features an original score by Philip Glass, featuring cello solos by Yo-Yo Ma; director Steven Soderbergh, a noted admirer of Reggio's first two films, served as executive producer. ~ Mark Deming, Rovi

 Read More


Director(s):
Godfrey Reggio
Theatrical MPAA Rating:
PG
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(7 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Leslie M.

This is not a movie. This is an acid trip.

Yes   |   No


John M.

"Disappointment", was my thought when I woke up -- a yawner for me. Expectations were high based on the previous works by the same guys. What happened, did you get bored with the project? Farm it out to first year students then skip the editing? Although reviews were not enticing, I had to see for myself. But I didn't. I fell asleep. Don't think I missed much. My favorite appearance was that of my hero Albert Einstein, apparently with his hands resting on Nicolai Tesla's generator. I loved his smile.

Yes   |   No


Kemp R.

I think that Koyaanisquatsi is one of the greatest films ever made (I've seen it over and over) and Powaqquatsi, although not nearly as good, was still worthwhile. This film, however, is almost unwatchably dull. Even Philip Glass' music was subpar. I gave up after 20 minutes. A major letdown.

Yes   |   No


Jay G.

this film just pulls you in, you try to create a narrative and it just lets you just absorb the images and music, and realize that the short flash of an image is so recognizable. Excellent. Really makes you think, and think for yourself.

Yes   |   No


Marcus V.

*Not nearly as good.* *See poor rating.* I just want to make sure people know that this movie is unlike the first two of the series. Much of the footage has effects added to it, weird color effects and the like. Personally, I don't think it helped nearly as much as it harmed the movie. The choice to add effects to this movie baffles me. My guess is that it's an attempt to add a kind of postmodernism. What also displeased me was some of the cutting, which made less sense compared to the previous movies. This movie came off looking much cheaper to me. Way more stock footage used, looking very much like they ran out of money for this one. The other two movies are great and hey, you can watch Baraka instead of this one. Overall this 3rd installment is not really worth the time. You should feel fine skipping it.

Yes   |   No


Debra K.

Unique in trilogy tho same 'communication' w/o language/meaning/signification. Footage ltd&stills abound, some fX, much b&w. After gazing@urban ruins, has print jrnlism feel,&images' affect thins 2 near-effacement. Vividly recall 0--despite violence, sex, destruction. Political figures, icons,logos elicit recognitions, associations, but flow's net effect like H2O thru a sieve. Glass mitig-/medi-ates w/ Y-Y Ma, whose gifts wash away w/ bathwater. Cannibal media 'war' leaves no trace, takes no prisoners. Baudrillard's 'Violence of the Image' apropos,&film may require theory 2wring value. Tho don't say as much, seems 2 be their point. Evokes indifference; if metastatement came thru, might evoke a kind of grief. Or shame. Rated so-so, approximating this un-(NOTdis-)affectation. After shock&awe?nostalgia&compassion? Trilogy's late-late-modern #1&2 had a residue; postmodern#3's fresh out.

Yes   |   No


Avi B.

this movie looked like something you could see on any college campus in the country during the time graduating seniors are showing their films. grainy, silly effects, with odd cello classical music, no linear movement of "plot" just random images. only watch this movie if you love laser shows, or you take a lot of LSD. i mean a lot.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Leslie M.

    This is not a movie. This is an acid trip.

    Yes   |   No

     
    John M.

    "Disappointment", was my thought when I woke up -- a yawner for me. Expectations were high based on the previous works by the same guys. What happened, did you get bored with the project? Farm it out to first year students then skip the editing? Although reviews were not enticing, I had to see for myself. But I didn't. I fell asleep. Don't think I missed much. My favorite appearance was that of my hero Albert Einstein, apparently with his hands resting on Nicolai Tesla's generator. I loved his smile.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Kemp R.

    I think that Koyaanisquatsi is one of the greatest films ever made (I've seen it over and over) and Powaqquatsi, although not nearly as good, was still worthwhile. This film, however, is almost unwatchably dull. Even Philip Glass' music was subpar. I gave up after 20 minutes. A major letdown.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 7 Reviews