Great North (2002) Reviews

Great North (2002)
Member Rating:  
This documentary from directors Martin J. Dignard and William Reeve revisits the arctic landscapes first seen in the classic 1922 film Nanook of the North. Great North covers such chilly terrain as icebergs, rivers, mountains, and valleys. ~ Matthew Tobey, Rovi

 Read More


Director(s):
William ReeveMartin J. Dignard, (more)
Format(s):
DVD  |  Blu-ray
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(3 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Glen P D.

Not much substance here. Cinematography is good but there just is not much here to enjoy. 40 minutes of watching carribou and a few people that aren't introduced very well.

Yes   |   No


William H.

This movie could have been much better... I was exspecting more entertainment and action packed some kinda good story line ..none of that in this movie....Dispointing movie...

Yes   |   No


John and Linda K.

The cinematography is very good, not great. The development was scant, but more might have been overkill, because the scope of the approach is narrow: a skeleton of history and people and lots of footage for each. It's a good short subject.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  from $10.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Glen P D.

    Not much substance here. Cinematography is good but there just is not much here to enjoy. 40 minutes of watching carribou and a few people that aren't introduced very well.

    Yes   |   No

     
    William H.

    This movie could have been much better... I was exspecting more entertainment and action packed some kinda good story line ..none of that in this movie....Dispointing movie...

    Yes   |   No

     
    John and Linda K.

    The cinematography is very good, not great. The development was scant, but more might have been overkill, because the scope of the approach is narrow: a skeleton of history and people and lots of footage for each. It's a good short subject.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 3 Reviews