DCSIMG
 
 

Jane Eyre (1944) Reviews

Jane Eyre (1944)
Play Trailer and Clips
Member Rating:  
Director Robert Stevenson collaborated with novelist Aldous Huxley and theatrical-producer John Houseman on the screenplay for this 1944 adaptation of Charlotte Bronte's gothic romance Jane Eyre. After several harrowing years in an orphanage, where she was placed by a supercilious relative for exhibiting the forbidden trait of "willfulness," Jane Eyre (Joan Fontaine) secures work as a governess. Her little charge, French-accented Adele (Margaret O'Brien), is pleasant enough. But Jane's employer, the brooding, tormented Edward Rochester (Orson Welles), terrifies the prim young governess. Under Jane's gentle influence, Rochester drops his forbidding veneer, going so far as to propose marriage to Jane. But they are forbidden connubial happiness when it is revealed that Rochester is still married to a gibbering lunatic whom he is forced to keep locked in his attic. Rochester reluctantly sends Jane away, but she returns, only to find that the insane wife has burned down the mansion and rendered Rochester sightless. In the tradition of Victorian romances, this purges Rochester of any previous sins, making him a worthy mate for the loving Jane. The presence of Orson Welles in the cast (he receives top billing), coupled with the dark, Germanic style of the direction and photography, has led some impressionable cineasts to conclude that Welles, and not Stevenson, was the director. To be sure, Welles contributed ideas throughout the filming; also, the script was heavily influenced by the Mercury Theater on the Air radio version of Jane Eyre, on which Welles, John Houseman and musical director Bernard Herrmann all collaborated. But Jane Eyre was made at 20th Century-Fox, a studio disinclined to promote the auteur theory; like most Fox productions, this is a work by committee rather than the product of one man. This in no way detracts from the overall excellence of the film; of all adaptations of Jane Eyre (it had previously been filmed in 1913, 1915 and 1921, and has been remade several times since), this 1943 version is one of the best. Keep an eye out for an uncredited Elizabeth Taylor as the consumptive orphanage friend of young Jane Eyre (played as child by Peggy Ann Gardner). ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Orson WellesJoan Fontaine, (more)
Director(s):
Robert Stevenson
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(18 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Megan F.

This is my favorite of all of the Jane Eyres. Bessie reminds me of a grandmother that I would like to have. The only downfall, if minor, is that Joan Fontaine doesn't change her expression much throughout the movie. Orson Welles plays a steady, but vulnerable Edward Rochester.

Yes   |   No


Carol C.

It had some excellent scenes I thought were endearing. As in many " old movies" it was melodramatic in parts. As one who enjoys the classics, I had previously watched the other two Jane Eyre movies. This is another good one. Different actors almost the same story line. Any one who apprecaites the classics will see entertainment in this one as well. carol catlin

Yes   |   No


Kate G.

This was an excellent retelling of the book. The movie was well cast and beautifully acted. Orson Wells made an excellent Mr. Rochester. My only complaint is that they omitted a large and rather significant portion of the story, and altered key charactors.

Yes   |   No


Alison A.

I hoped I would get the masterpiece theater version, but was very pleased to recieve this edition. But the masterpiece theater is still my favorite.

Yes   |   No


Lynda S.

possible the best of the Jane Eyre movie

Yes   |   No


Adele S.

This Jane Eyre (1944) rounds up all of the movies that have been made to date on this subject. I love the story so much I must say I loved all versions of it.

Yes   |   No


Pam M.

This has always been one of my favorite movies and novels. None of the remakes have been as good as this original version. The actors, Wells, OBrien and Fontaine, were of course hard to beat. And the gloomy, darkness of this setting made it even more thrilling.

Yes   |   No


Maurice S.

since the disc arrived cracked, I was unable to watch the movie.

Yes   |   No


Mary K.

If you are looking for a great adaptation of the book try something else. I love old movies, but this one just flat doesn't do it for me sorry

Yes   |   No


M K.

This movie was a disappointment, compared to other productions of Jane Eyre. It cut out many essential parts of the book and changed certain parts of the story. I'm sure part of the reason was the time required to fully tell the story. I would recommend instead the Masterpiece Theatre version with Toby Stephens and Ruth Wilson, which is a much more faithful telling of the story, with a wonderful cast.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $14.99
 

IN-STORE

 

ON DEMAND

Blockbuster Instant Video

Watch thousands of movies instantly on your TV, tablet, mobile phone or computer with no monthly subscription. You pay only for what you watch.
 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Megan F.

    This is my favorite of all of the Jane Eyres. Bessie reminds me of a grandmother that I would like to have. The only downfall, if minor, is that Joan Fontaine doesn't change her expression much throughout the movie. Orson Welles plays a steady, but vulnerable Edward Rochester.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Carol C.

    It had some excellent scenes I thought were endearing. As in many " old movies" it was melodramatic in parts. As one who enjoys the classics, I had previously watched the other two Jane Eyre movies. This is another good one. Different actors almost the same story line. Any one who apprecaites the classics will see entertainment in this one as well. carol catlin

    Yes   |   No

     
    Kate G.

    This was an excellent retelling of the book. The movie was well cast and beautifully acted. Orson Wells made an excellent Mr. Rochester. My only complaint is that they omitted a large and rather significant portion of the story, and altered key charactors.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 18 Reviews