And Then There Were None (1945) Reviews

And Then There Were None (1945)
Member Rating:  
Based on the classic novel by mystery author Agatha Christie that was later adapted as the Broadway hit Ten Little Indians , And Then There Were None begins with ten characters, each with a skeleton in his or her closet, on a remote island off the English coast. They soon realize that they have been brought there by an insane judge, who has tried each of them for criminal behavior in the past, and who now feels it is his duty to render proper justice for each. The struggle to stay alive begins as each "guest" is eliminated in a fashion that corresponds to the titular nursery rhyme. Walter Huston, Louis Hayward, and C. Aubrey Smith are among those marked for death. The film's ending differs from that of the novel, and later remakes in 1966, 1975, and 1989 (all using the title Ten Little Indians), alternated between Christie's original finale and this film's climax. Depending on one's taste, the film's pacing is either excruciatingly slow or suspenseful, but the storyline has become a cinematic staple in everything from horror (Theatre Of Blood) to satire (Murder By Death). ~ Don Kaye, Rovi

 Read More


Starring:
Barry FitzgeraldWalter Huston, (more)
Director(s):
René Clair
Format(s):
DVD
View All Versions to rent and buy
 
 
 
 

Average Ratings

(13 member reviews)  


Member Reviews


Chris K.

The entire ending wasn't predictable, but (the character(s)) that survived is pretty obvious unfortunately. The cast was amazing and versatile and each played his or her part famously. From the senile general, to the boisterous prince, and the even-tempered judge...all were played very well. I'd recommend this film to anyone that can spare an uninterrupted hour or two. It's engrossing, though it may only hold your interest upon watching it once. Once you know the ending, it's not as exciting the second or third time. It's fun predicting who will die next.

Yes   |   No


Jeff B.

IT IS AN OLD MOVIE, BUT IS WORTH TO WACTH. BETTER THAN SOME NEW RELEASES.

Yes   |   No


Benjamin J.

This one was as good as the book with a better cast.

Yes   |   No


Jann H.

I love the classics, so I'm partial to the old b&w films and the stars of years gone by. This flick was entertaining and definitely worth seeing if you are "classics" fan.

Yes   |   No


N H.

A great old Agatha Christie murder mystery. Seen it several times and always like seeing the great actors

Yes   |   No


Jane P.

Wonderful and classic Agatha Christie novel turned into a movie....and probably the best adaption of one of her books. Only problem is that the film quality is old and grainy and it needs restoration.

Yes   |   No


Sloan H.

This is a pretty good "old movie" as far as old movies go. Having read the book, I knew what to look for as far as figuring out the mystery. The ending is different from the book, but is acceptable. (Before watching I wondered how hollywood would handle the book version of the ending and if they would alter it). I'm getting the 60's version of the agatha story next to see how they implemented the story). If nothing else, its a nice walk down the hollywood timeline, you get this one, the 60's one, and then you can watch modern adaptations like Harper's Island (mini series). I might pass on the 1989 Frank Stallone version. If you like old movies, then I think this one will work for you. If you don't know if you like old movies, this one is a good test-case, especially if you haven't read the book. Do NOT find any spoilers, or it'll ruin the experience.

Yes   |   No


Carol C.

Carol C. Despite its age, this classic is still suspenseful and pulls in the viewer. As people begin to die in the isolated island setting a paranoia sets in among the cast of characters that passes over into the viewer. The acting is excellent and there is plenty of humor too. This is a bit dated but still good entertainment.

Yes   |   No


Ron C.

Another clever whodunnit from the mistress of mystery. The movie has a happier ending than the book.

Yes   |   No


Joyce C.

This film is probably better to watch before watching the 1960s remake with Hugh O'Brian. The scripts for the film are close to identical, but this one has more of the noirish atmosphere.

Yes   |   No


 
 
 

BY MAIL

Monthly Subscription
NEW! 7 - Day Rental
No subscription required. Usually ships in 24 hours.
 
Buy New  $6.99
 

IN-STORE

 

What's Your Take?

Add to FavoritesIn Favorites  |  Share:     Email to a friendShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
    YOUR REVIEW
    WRITE A REVIEW
     
    1000 
     
    Member Reviews
     
    Chris K.

    The entire ending wasn't predictable, but (the character(s)) that survived is pretty obvious unfortunately. The cast was amazing and versatile and each played his or her part famously. From the senile general, to the boisterous prince, and the even-tempered judge...all were played very well. I'd recommend this film to anyone that can spare an uninterrupted hour or two. It's engrossing, though it may only hold your interest upon watching it once. Once you know the ending, it's not as exciting the second or third time. It's fun predicting who will die next.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Jeff B.

    IT IS AN OLD MOVIE, BUT IS WORTH TO WACTH. BETTER THAN SOME NEW RELEASES.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Benjamin J.

    This one was as good as the book with a better cast.

    Yes   |   No

     
    Read All 13 Reviews